When Piety Is Not Enough: Religio-Political Organizations in Pursuit of Peace and Reconciliation in Zimbabwe

Abstract

In post-independence Zimbabwe, religion has been associated with piety and acquiescence rather than radical confrontation. This has made it look preposterous for religious leaders to adopt seemingly radical and confrontational stances in pursuit of peace and reconciliation. Since the early 2000s, a new breed of religious leaders that deploy radical and confrontational strategies to pursue peace has emerged in Zimbabwe. Rather than restricting pathways to peace and reconciliation to nonconfrontational approaches such as empathy, pacifism, prayer, meditation, love, repentance, compassion, apology and forgiveness, these religious leaders have extended them to demonstrations, petitions and critically speaking out. Because these religious leaders do not restrict themselves to the methods and strategies of engagement and dialogue advocated by mainstream church leaders, mainstream church leaders and politicians condemn them as nonconformists that transcend their religious mandate. These religious leaders have redefined and reframed the meaning and method of pursuing peace and reconciliation in Zimbabwe and brought a new consciousness on the role of religious leaders in times of political violence and hostility. Through qualitative interviews with religious leaders from a network called Churches in Manicaland in Zimbabwe, which emerged at the height of political violence in the early 2000s, and locating the discussion within the discourse of peace and reconciliation, this article argues that the pursuit of peace and reconciliation by religious actors is not a predefined and linear, but rather a paradoxical and hermeneutical exercise which might involve seemingly contradictory approaches such as “hard” and “soft” strategies. Resultantly, religio-political nonconformism should not be perceived as a stubborn departure from creeds and conventions, but rather as a phenomenon that espouses potential to positively change socio-economic and political dynamics that advance peace and reconciliation.

Religious Bourgeois Lifestyle of Celebrity Hijrah: Reading the Resurrection of the Muslim Middle Class Based on Cultural Imperalism and Global Economic Factors

“…In line with Hasbullah (2012) idea, the rise of the Indonesian Muslim middle class is also caused by the transformation of the acceleration of economic development during the New Order. This description distorts the views of Afrianty (2020), Ja'far (2020), Mahmood (2005) and Tarusarira (2020) which explain that the emergence of Piety in the public space is an activity in order to gain political mass.…”

Positioning Religion in International Relations: The Performative, Discursive, and Relational Dimension of Religious Soft Power

“…Second, they point to the urgent human rights concern such as Afghan refugees and argue that the Grotian moment has arrived for the religious community to uphold universal moral principles and transfer the political status quo fundamentally, modeling themselves the only appropriate solution indispensable for the wide-reaching and imminent crisis. After establishing a broad and solid audience base to generate the bottom-up momentums in political, economic, social, and cultural arenas (Bean 2014), TRAs can also infiltrate into the policy-making procedure and persuade secular leaders to "incorporate religious beliefs, norms, and values into foreign policy" for the top-down religious influence, as demonstrated in scholars' examination of Islam-informed foreign politics in Middle Eastern states and the Balkans (Öztürk 2020Mandaville and Hamid 2018;Ciftci and Tezcür 2016;Haynes 2021;Tarusarira 2020). This top-down and bottom-up religious soft power can further translate into an accountability mechanism applied by both the state and religious non-state actors (RNGOs) to reinforce transparency, responsibility, and liability in multinational coalitions and global governance (Steiner 2011).…”

Studying Religiosity and Spirituality: A Review of Macro, Micro, and Meso-Level Approaches

“…The micro-level approaches within Africa included three books (Oxford University Press, Routledge, and Lexington Books: Ackah et al 2017;Bragg et al 2015;, 2 conference papers (Adogame and Amwe 2019; Swidler 2019), one report (Chilimampunga and Thindwa 2012), and 15 journal articles. The journals were: Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (4), the Australasian Review of African Studies (3), Religions (2), and one each from: African Studies Review, the George Washington International Law Review, HTS Teologiese Studies, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, OKH Journal, and PloS One (Ashforth 2015;Dicks 2013;McNamara 2015;Van Der Meer 2013;Mgbako and Glenn 2011;Schoeman 2017;Agadjanian and Yabiku 2015;Beck and Gundersen 2016;Hayford and Trinitapoli 2011;Moaddel and Karabenick 2018;Launiala and Honkasalo 2010;Nyasulu 2020;Pell et al 2013;Huber and Huber 2012;Tarusarira 2020). The studied countries include: Malawi (9), Ghana (3), South Africa (2), Burkina Faso (1), Egypt (1), Kenya (1), Zimbabwe (1), Morocco (1), Mozambique (1), Nigeria (1), and Sudan (1).…”