2013
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2013.47a002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When the Sound-Symbolism Effect Disappears: The Differential Role of Order and Timing in Presenting Visual and Auditory Stimuli

Abstract: Köhler's observation that most people match pseudoword "maluma" to curvy objects and "takete" to spiky objects represented the well-known example of sound symbolism-the idea that link between sound and meaning of words was not entirely arbitrary. This study was aimed to examine the existence of sound symbolism in natural language and to consider the potential role of some aspects of experimental design and stimuli features which had not been considered in experimental studies so far. Three experiments were don… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding runs counter to the facilitatory effects on RTs for pseudowords observed by Westbury (2005), and the inhibitory effects on RT to both words and pseudowords in Sucevic et al (2013). As described previously, minor experimental manipulations of the timing of stimuli and the visual shapes employed as frames can have dramatic effects on whether sound symbolic effects are observed in RT, making this result difficult to interpret at this stage.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This finding runs counter to the facilitatory effects on RTs for pseudowords observed by Westbury (2005), and the inhibitory effects on RT to both words and pseudowords in Sucevic et al (2013). As described previously, minor experimental manipulations of the timing of stimuli and the visual shapes employed as frames can have dramatic effects on whether sound symbolic effects are observed in RT, making this result difficult to interpret at this stage.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Given the known fragility of sound symbolic effects in behavioural tasks (Sucevic et al, 2013), it is perhaps unsurprising that the lexical decision task did not pick up differences in processing speed: Sound symbolic effects are known to be evident in the first 500 ms of the ERP (Kovic et al, 2010). Here, correct reaction times averaged over 700 ms, meaning that sound symbolic effects may have subsided by the time of the lexical decision.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations