2020
DOI: 10.1111/btp.12916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When waterholes get busy, rare interactions thrive: Photographic evidence of a jaguar (Panthera onca) killing an ocelot (Leopardus pardalis)

Abstract: During a camera trap survey conducted in Guatemala in the 2019 dry season, we documented a jaguar killing an ocelot at a waterhole with high mammal activity. During severe droughts, the probability of aggressive interactions between carnivores might increase when fixed, valuable resources such as water cannot be easily partitioned.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We determined potential prey species based on available literature (Hayward et al, 2016; Luja et al, 2020; Perera-Romero et al, 2021) and followed the protocol described by Sanderson & Harris (2012) for the organization and analysis of camera-trap photographs. We calculated the relative abundance index (RAI) using the formula proposed by Maffei et al (2004): RAI = ( C /SE) × 100 where C is the number of photographic captures, SE is the sampling effort (number of cameras per monitoring day) per 100 camera days (standard correction factor).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We determined potential prey species based on available literature (Hayward et al, 2016; Luja et al, 2020; Perera-Romero et al, 2021) and followed the protocol described by Sanderson & Harris (2012) for the organization and analysis of camera-trap photographs. We calculated the relative abundance index (RAI) using the formula proposed by Maffei et al (2004): RAI = ( C /SE) × 100 where C is the number of photographic captures, SE is the sampling effort (number of cameras per monitoring day) per 100 camera days (standard correction factor).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, water deposits commonly favor the presence of organisms that constitute an important food source for a variety of vertebrates (Gossner et al, 2020). Therefore, water availability can directly or indirectly affect population dynamics (Gandiwa et al, 2016), movement (Chamaillé‐Jammes et al, 2013), habitat use (Bennitt et al, 2014), spatial distribution (Paredes et al, 2017), and interspecific interactions (Perera‐Romero et al, 2021) of all terrestrial vertebrates.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is possible that the need to meet their water requirements outweighs the negative interactions among badger) and canids (Lehner 1981;Minta et al 1992;Clark et al 2015) the species in our study site. In previous studies it has been recorded that the probability of negative interactions between species might increase especially when there are limited resources such as water (Rosenstock et al 1999;Krausman et al 2006;Perera-Romero et al 2021). However, negative interactions, such as kicking, pushing, or chasing among species, when using waterholes were not recorded in our study site as in other studies (Rosenstock et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waterholes are sources of water for many species of different taxa, such as reptiles, birds, and mammals (Martínez-Kú et al 2008;Delgado-Martínez et al 2018), and several of these species also use waterholes as refuge and resting areas (Martínez-Kú et al 2008). However, species can also be negatively affected when visiting waterholes due to the increased risk of predation or competitive interactions (Rosenstock et al 1999;Krausman et al 2006;Hall et al 2013;Perera-Romero et al 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%