2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-5357(00)00080-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where’s the glue? Institutional and cultural foundations of American Indian economic development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with many scientific results (Cornell and Kalt 1991, Jorgensen and Taylor 2000, Trosper et al 2008. It certainly contrasts with "the traditional model, where Chief and Council were responsible for the everyday management of community-owned businesses" (Graham and Wilson 2004).…”
Section: The Role Of the Band Council: Supporting Without Interferingsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is consistent with many scientific results (Cornell and Kalt 1991, Jorgensen and Taylor 2000, Trosper et al 2008. It certainly contrasts with "the traditional model, where Chief and Council were responsible for the everyday management of community-owned businesses" (Graham and Wilson 2004).…”
Section: The Role Of the Band Council: Supporting Without Interferingsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…in this context, elected leaders appear to have difficulty keeping order and organizing community contributions to collective goods. 60 Beath, christia, and Enikolopov 2013b;cornell and Kalt 2000;Englebert 2000;Wade 1988. 61 For an example of this type of collaboration, see the discussion in swidler 2013, 323. although our empirical analysis focuses exclusively on liberia, research by other scholars in other settings is consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cornell and Kalt 2000) of Bininj governance lies in its institutions; that is, in its own 'rules of the game', the way things should be done. These give legitimacy to practice, and include laws, kinship and marriage systems, behavioural and gender norms, family values, religious beliefs and moral system, principles of land ownership, ceremony and ritual, and so on (see Kesteven and Smith 1984;.…”
Section: Re-imagining Indigenous Governancementioning
confidence: 99%