2018
DOI: 10.1097/pra.0000000000000315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whether Called Acute Suicidal Affective Disturbance or Suicide Crisis Syndrome, a Suicide-specific Diagnosis Would Enhance Clinical Care, Increase Patient Safety, and Mitigate Clinician Liability

Abstract: Separate research groups have independently argued the need for a suicide-specific diagnosis within the psychiatric diagnostic nomenclature. Although a suicide-specific diagnosis could possibly enhance clinical care and improve patient safety, some clinicians have expressed concerns regarding the legal risk of utilizing a suicide-specific diagnosis. In this column, the first of a 2-part series exploring the potential risks and benefits of a suicide-specific diagnosis, the authors draw from their decades of exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although an argument can be made for legal responsibility of clinicians should they employ such a diagnosis, the opposite may in fact be true (Joiner, Simpson, Rogers, Stanley, & Galynker, ). When a patient dies by suicide, a lawsuit arguing for medical malpractice would include determining if proper steps have been taken for the mitigation of his/her suicide risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although an argument can be made for legal responsibility of clinicians should they employ such a diagnosis, the opposite may in fact be true (Joiner, Simpson, Rogers, Stanley, & Galynker, ). When a patient dies by suicide, a lawsuit arguing for medical malpractice would include determining if proper steps have been taken for the mitigation of his/her suicide risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an argument can be made for legal responsibility of clinicians should they employ such a diagnosis, the opposite may in fact be true (Joiner, Simpson, Rogers, Stanley, & Galynker, 2018…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept emphasizes that symptoms develop very quickly. Its main components are: drastic increase in suicidal intents over the course of hours or days; marked social alienation (e.g., social withdrawal, disgust with others, perceived burdensomeness) and/or self-alienation (self-hatred, perceptions that one's psychological pain is a burden); the above mentioned are hopelessly unchangeable; and over-arousal (agitation, irritability, insomnia, nightmares) (12). A 28-item clinical scale (ASADI-L) was also developed to assess lifetime ASAD symptoms (17).…”
Section: Acute Suicidal Affective Disturbance and Suicidal Crisis Synmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these are clinically important features, they alone provide little useful information on the background of suicidal behavior (e.g., mental disorder, crisis situation, etc.) and do not help to identify warning signs or acute risk and to predict future suicidal behavior (12,13). Because acute suicide risk usually develops rapidly (up to some days or hours) (14), it would be necessary to introduce a category that emphasizes the characteristics of this life-threatening pre-suicidal state of mind requiring urgent intervention (15,16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, conditions that result in death but lack a diagnostic label may lead to misclassification of cause of death in registries. Finally, despite concerns that a suicide‐specific diagnosis may facilitate lawsuits, it may actually enhance patient care and mitigate clinician liability (Joiner, Simpson, Rogers, Stanley, & Galynker, ).…”
Section: Conceptual Clinical and Practical Rationale For A New Diagmentioning
confidence: 99%