2016 IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cca.2016.7587980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which methodology is more appropriate to solve Eco-driving Optimal Control Problem for conventional vehicles?

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, two simplified methods based on Dynamic Programming (DP) to solve an Eco-driving problem for a conventional vehicle equipped with an internal combustion engine are studied. The first method is based on the transformation of a time-based Optimal Control Problem (OCP) into a distance-based OCP while the second is based on solving the time-based OCP directly. The Pontryagin Minimum Principle (PMP) is used to decrease the complexity of the OCP formulation. Based on simulations, the two meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison between the time-based and the space-based OCP solutions for a conventional vehicle is given in (Maamria et al, 2016b). If the position space is discretized in N points with a fixed step ∆x, the time step ∆t(k), k = 1 : N is variable and is implicitly calculated from the vehicle speed v(k) and the vehicle acceleration a(k) by solving the second order equation…”
Section: Solving Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between the time-based and the space-based OCP solutions for a conventional vehicle is given in (Maamria et al, 2016b). If the position space is discretized in N points with a fixed step ∆x, the time step ∆t(k), k = 1 : N is variable and is implicitly calculated from the vehicle speed v(k) and the vehicle acceleration a(k) by solving the second order equation…”
Section: Solving Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chosen approach transforms a time-based OCP into a distance-based OCP as suggested in (F. Mensing, 2013;Monastyrsky and Golownykh, 1993;Bouvier et al, 2015) in order to reduce the computation time (a comparison between the time-based and the space-based OCP solutions is given in (Maamria et al, 2016)). …”
Section: Solving Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constant tunable parameter β penalizes the final time to obtain almost the same time duration as the initial driving cycle: the study in (F. Mensing, 2013;Maamria et al, 2016) shows that the relation between t f = ∑ N k=1 ∆t(k) and β is monotone. A root-finding method could be used to drive the final time error to zero (Mensing et al, 2011;Sciarretta et al, 2015).…”
Section: Solving Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban and ∆x = 20m for the other driving cycles. These values of ∆x were chosen so as to have a time step approximately around 1s [33]. Two cases are studied: electric and conventional.…”
Section: Numerical Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control variables are the engine torque T e and the gear-box ratio R gb . The following DP mesh parameters are chosen based on the results presented in [33]: ∆v = 0.1m/s for the vehicle speed and ∆T e = 2N.m for the engine torque 2 . For scenario I, the results in terms of fuel consumption, fuel saving through eco-driving with respect to the initial driving cycles and computation time of the DP t co are given in Table VII.…”
Section: B Case Of a Conventional Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%