“…As argued by Gilboa (2008), scholars in public diplomacy ought to provide a more robust theoretical foundation to the field in order to clear the confusion and push the field forward. Over the past two decades, several public diplomacy taxonomies, models, and theoretical perspectives have been introduced by scholars (Cull, 2008; Entman, 2008; Fullerton & Kendrick, 2017; Gilboa, 2008; Golan, 2015), while others drew on public relations and mass communication theories to predict and explain some of the key relationship and reputation management functions of public diplomacy (Grunig, 1993; Tam & Kim, 2019; Yun, 2006) or its public opinion outcomes (Nisbet, Nisbet, Scheufele, & Shanahan, 2004; Sheafer & Gabay, 2009; Stoycheff & Nisbet, 2016). While both approaches provide important contributions to the field’s continued development, public diplomacy is fundamentally undermined by the continuous lack of a clear organizing theoretical foundation that can guide its scholarship forward.…”