2015
DOI: 10.1080/10383441.2015.1063570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who killed the EnviroPig? Assemblages, genetically engineered animals and patents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For such a program to be possible, legal approval is necessary but has, so far, not been given, which has prohibited practical applications in livestock for food production. Early GM pig breeding programs, such as the EnviroPig, failed largely due to complex regulatory frameworks (Sanderson, 2015). The only GM animal with approval for human consumption is the AquAdvantage salmon (FDA, 2015).…”
Section: Breeding Schemes Incorporating Gm or Genome Edited Cattlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such a program to be possible, legal approval is necessary but has, so far, not been given, which has prohibited practical applications in livestock for food production. Early GM pig breeding programs, such as the EnviroPig, failed largely due to complex regulatory frameworks (Sanderson, 2015). The only GM animal with approval for human consumption is the AquAdvantage salmon (FDA, 2015).…”
Section: Breeding Schemes Incorporating Gm or Genome Edited Cattlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the previous dilemma, more proactive risk assessments need to be carried out for each scenario, considering the moral weight of the potential uncertainties [111]. In 2012, the Enviropig pig work was ultimately cancelled, but it raised several extrinsic ethical considerations including perpetuation of intensive pig farming and monopolized corporate agriculture [113]. Veterinarians need to speak up as animal welfare advocates using scientific and ethic-based principles rather than react defensively to constantly changing public expectations and moral pluralism.…”
Section: Applied Ethical Challenges In Modern Industrial Animal Farmingmentioning
confidence: 99%