Whole-genome sequence of the Tibetan frog Nanorana parkeri and the comparative evolution of tetrapod genomes

Abstract

The development of efficient sequencing techniques has resulted in large numbers of genomes being available for evolutionary studies. However, only one genome is available for all amphibians, that of Xenopus tropicalis, which is distantly related from the majority of frogs. More than 96% of frogs belong to the Neobatrachia, and no genome exists for this group. This dearth of amphibian genomes greatly restricts genomic studies of amphibians and, more generally, our understanding of tetrapod genome evolution. To fill this gap, we provide the de novo genome of a Tibetan Plateau frog, Nanorana parkeri, and compare it to that of X. tropicalis and other vertebrates. This genome encodes more than 20,000 protein-coding genes, a number similar to that of Xenopus. Although the genome size of Nanorana is considerably larger than that of Xenopus (2.3 vs. 1.5 Gb), most of the difference is due to the respective number of transposable elements in the two genomes. The two frogs exhibit considerable conserved whole-genome synteny despite having diverged approximately 266 Ma, indicating a slow rate of DNA structural evolution in anurans. Multigenome synteny blocks further show that amphibians have fewer interchromosomal rearrangements than mammals but have a comparable rate of intrachromosomal rearrangements. Our analysis also identifies 11 Mb of anuran-specific highly conserved elements that will be useful for comparative genomic analyses of frogs. The Nanorana genome offers an improved understanding of evolution of tetrapod genomes and also provides a genomic reference for other evolutionary studies.de novo genome | transposable elements | chromosome rearrangement | highly conserved element T he age of genomics has ushered in opportunities to decode the history of evolution in ways unimaginable only a decade ago. More than 100 complete genomes have been sequenced and released for vertebrates. Amphibians, however, are poorly represented among these genomes. Despite the existence of more than 7,000 living species of amphibians, only the genome of Xenopus tropicalis (1) has been published. Xenopus tropicalis, however, falls outside of the Neobatrachia, which contains more than 96% of the known frog species (2). As a result, no neobatrachian genome is available for comparative analyses. Thus, this dearth of amphibian genomes greatly restricts comparative genomic studies of amphibians, and more generally, our understanding of a critical portion of tetrapod genome evolution at the major aquatic to terrestrial transition of vertebrates.Nanorana (Dicroglossidae) includes more than 20 species of frogs native to Asia (research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia). In this genus, three species, Nanorana parkeri, Nanorana pleskei, and Nanorana ventripunctata, are endemic to the QinghaiTibetan Plateau (3). In contrast to Xenopus, which is a secondarily derived aquatic obligate, species of Nanorana exhibit the terrestrial adult lifestyle that is typical of most anurans. N. parkeri occurs at elevations ranging from 2,850 to 5,000 m. Because thi...

The axolotl genome and the evolution of key tissue formation regulators

“…We found that 194 (98.5%) of 197 non-exonic UCEs that are conserved across vertebrates align to the axolotl assembly. By comparison, 189 and 192 UCEs align to the Tibetan frog and Xenopus genomes, respectively, and 195 UCEs align to the coelacanth genome, indicating that the completeness of the axolotl genome assembly is comparable to or better than the two other amphibian genomes, which are smaller than 2.3 Gb 10 .…”

High-density sex-specific linkage maps of a European tree frog (Hyla arborea) identify the sex chromosome without information on offspring sex

“…In H. arborea, Dufresnes et al (2014a) inferred two other linkage groups that each contained two markers mapped to the same X. tropicalis chromosome (chromosomes 2 and 8), hinting at conserved synteny in at least two other chromosomes. More recently, Sun et al (2015) reported conservation of large synteny blocks between X. tropicalis and the Tibetan frog Nanorana parkeri, although the Nanorana genome assembly did not allow comparison of entire chromosomes. We extend these previously published results by assigning each Hyla linkage group to one Xenopus chromosome (or in the case of LG 4A7A, two chromosomes), and by identifying large blocks of conserved marker order on several chromosomes (Figure 2a).…”

Microsatellite landscape evolutionary dynamics across 450 million years of vertebrate genome evolution

“…As we completed data analysis for this study, a second amphibian genome, that of the Tibetan frog (Nanorana parkeri; Sun et al 2015), was released. The microsatellite characteristics of this second frog genome appear to be comparable to that of Xenopus.…”