2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whose environmental justice? Exploring local and global perspectives in a payments for ecosystem services scheme in Rwanda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these schemes may hold significant promise for conservation, there are still great uncertainties with regards to which groups will benefit, with some critics arguing that these initiatives may potentially diminish the power of local communities for controlling the management of their own natural resources. For example, procedures of stakeholder consultation which aim to achieve transparency and equal partnerships, and which address issues that affect the rights and capacity of local communities, are still problematic (Okereke and Dooley, 2010;Martin et al, 2013). Many indigenous groups in the Guiana Shield do not have rights to their traditional land and the resources which are found within these (Colchester et al, 2001;Rainforest Alliance, 2012).…”
Section: Insert Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these schemes may hold significant promise for conservation, there are still great uncertainties with regards to which groups will benefit, with some critics arguing that these initiatives may potentially diminish the power of local communities for controlling the management of their own natural resources. For example, procedures of stakeholder consultation which aim to achieve transparency and equal partnerships, and which address issues that affect the rights and capacity of local communities, are still problematic (Okereke and Dooley, 2010;Martin et al, 2013). Many indigenous groups in the Guiana Shield do not have rights to their traditional land and the resources which are found within these (Colchester et al, 2001;Rainforest Alliance, 2012).…”
Section: Insert Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por ejemplo, el uso inter-generacional de los recursos considera el tiempo histórico agrario de las comunidades originarias. Esta transformación axiomática de comprensión de los recursos naturales y su administración, a gran escala, requiere la democratización de la justicia ambiental que implique el reconocimiento del patrimonio ecológico y cultural intangible y desarrolle procesos de participación y regulación para salvaguardarlo (Martin et al, 2014). Los gobiernos de América Latina deberían explorar una gestión de sus bosques, sus páramos, su biodiversidad a partir del reconocimiento sobre el valor estratégico ecológico y cultural de estos bienes, promoviendo mecanismos internacionales y lobbies para su reconocimiento legal y legítimo.…”
Section: Explorando Tecnología Saber Ecológico Local E Innovaciónunclassified
“…Otra parte de la literatura, dando particular atención a la justicia ambiental y al estudio de los conflictos ambientales, reflexiona la gobernanza como un lugar de debate político donde se perciben tensiones irreconciliables acerca de las maneras de concebir y administrar los recursos naturales (Castro, 2017;Martin et al, 2014;Dietz, 2014;Dietz y Engels, 2017). Hasta ahora existen pocos estudios que analicen la innovación institucional de la gobernanza desde una perspectiva bottom-up, que posibilite la articulación institucional de políticas intersectoriales a partir de ideas innovadoras surgidas de la interacción entre los nichos tecnológicos y las prácticas territoriales de los actores locales.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Another may be to recognize that local social and resource management/tenure complexities may render PES schemes inappropriate in certain cases. ''Local participation'' in PES schemes is increasingly highlighted as means to redress early problems, but is not a panacea and merits further examination, as do concepts of environmental justice in PES (Martin et al 2013;Suiseeya and Caplow 2013).…”
Section: Objective 3: Local Control and Environmental Justicementioning
confidence: 99%