2009 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium 2009
DOI: 10.1109/rws.2009.4957398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wide-band 0.25μm CMOS passive mixer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the next phase of the study, it has been attempted to bias the gates of the mixer core which has been done for the first time, in this study. This has been done for similar mixers but without single‐to‐differential converter baluns and nonintegrated baluns . Figure shows the complete mixer circuit with single‐to‐differential baluns and biased gates.…”
Section: Mixer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next phase of the study, it has been attempted to bias the gates of the mixer core which has been done for the first time, in this study. This has been done for similar mixers but without single‐to‐differential converter baluns and nonintegrated baluns . Figure shows the complete mixer circuit with single‐to‐differential baluns and biased gates.…”
Section: Mixer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A double‐balanced resistive mixer also exhibits inherent high linearity [2, 3], and it has been shown to be suitable for both homodyne and heterodyne wireless transceivers [4]. Most double‐balanced mixers reported to date have been implemented using four MOSFETs (mixer core) and additional passive elements for RF [5–7], LO [5, 6], and IF matching [7], and to improve LO efficiency [8]. These passive elements occupy significantly more space on the chip die than the mixer transistor core.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These passive elements occupy significantly more space on the chip die than the mixer transistor core. In addition, typically, a double‐balanced mixer configuration requires single‐ended to differential transitions at the RF and LO ports, which are usually implemented off‐chip [4–9], adding cost, size, and complexity. If used in direct down‐conversion receivers, these mixers typically require DC cancellation circuitry to eliminate large DC offset [10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%