2017IEEE 9th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environme 2017
DOI: 10.1109/hnicem.2017.8269462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless sensor nodes for flood forecasting using artificial neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the exogenous inputs, overflow average and the registry of rains were applied; thus, from the total data 70% was taken to train the NNARX, and the remaining 30% to perform tests. Both, [28] and [29] comparison performances of NNARX together with the ANN and NNAR were made to confirm that the best results were obtained with the first technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the exogenous inputs, overflow average and the registry of rains were applied; thus, from the total data 70% was taken to train the NNARX, and the remaining 30% to perform tests. Both, [28] and [29] comparison performances of NNARX together with the ANN and NNAR were made to confirm that the best results were obtained with the first technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this regard, [25] implemented data of the Kelang river to predict the level of water for three hours in advance; the same study compared four different cases in which the variation was given in terms of time; besides, different algorithms were carried out: Gradient Descent (GD), Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) and One Step Secant (OSS). The LM training algorithm was used in [26] showing a suitable performance, in [27] a comparison of its performance with that of the Bayesian Regularization was performed, while [28] found that the GD algorithm presented a better performance compared to the algorithm OSS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardware setup contains a microcontroller, solar penal, ultrasonic sensor, and GSM module. A Feedforward network with backpropagation is used and for optimizing the network Levenberg-Marquardt training algorithm is used [Sahagun et al 2017]. In some cases, a tree-based ML model is also used to predict the sensitivity of flooded areas based on the spatial parameters [Lee et al 2017].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22], flood events were predicted using numerical weather prediction (NWP) with improved accuracy. In [23], the main objective is to predict the high-risk area by water level using Artificial Neural Network in Masantol, Pampanga. In [24], a flood event prediction model based on SVM and boosting algorithm was presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%