2009
DOI: 10.1126/science.1166214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wood Energy in America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Refueling urban forest restoration through coppicing requires serious consideration, particularly in light of increased interest in wood fuel as a carbon-lean energy source (Jansen and Kuiper 2004;McPherson 1998;Richter et al 2009;Yokohari et al 2006). With the threat of global climate change and the pressing need to curb carbon emissions, urban forest restoration activities that incorporate historic traditions of wood fuel production offer the opportunity to expand the benefits of contemporary urban forestry in exciting new ways.…”
Section: Urban Forestry and Urban Forest Restorationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Refueling urban forest restoration through coppicing requires serious consideration, particularly in light of increased interest in wood fuel as a carbon-lean energy source (Jansen and Kuiper 2004;McPherson 1998;Richter et al 2009;Yokohari et al 2006). With the threat of global climate change and the pressing need to curb carbon emissions, urban forest restoration activities that incorporate historic traditions of wood fuel production offer the opportunity to expand the benefits of contemporary urban forestry in exciting new ways.…”
Section: Urban Forestry and Urban Forest Restorationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Forest certification (Cashore, Auld, & Newsom, 2004) and various carbon credits (Cairns & Lasserre, 2006) and REDD+ (Corbera, Schroeder, & Springate-Baginski, 2011) encourage forest management to provide carbon sequestration and other values such as biodiversity in the forest. Other policies are being considered to harvest forests for CO 2 reductions and FF savings (Cubbage, Harou, & Sills, 2007;Richter et al, 2009). The above issues need to be clarified before policies can be crafted that promote desired goals such as biodiversity protection, CO 2 sequestration, and FF savings (Ruddell et al, 2007 The National Research Council (1976) compared FF savings by using wood alternatives to steel, concrete, brick, and aluminum building materials in the 1970s.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recommended by Evans and Perschel (2009), guidelines that go beyond minimum requirements may be required to ensure that appropriate levels of standing dead trees, coarse woody material and fine woody material are maintained for biodiversity. Designing and monitoring such balanced systems remains a challenge (Berg 2003), but are necessary to gain public support for bioenergy production (Richter et al 2009). …”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%