1995
DOI: 10.14214/aff.7510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wood procurement in the pressure of change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The net income from a timber sale was calculated by subtracting the harvesting costs from the roadside value of the harvested trees. Harvesting costs were calculated with the models of Rummukainen et al [45].…”
Section: Use Of the Monsu Planning Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net income from a timber sale was calculated by subtracting the harvesting costs from the roadside value of the harvested trees. Harvesting costs were calculated with the models of Rummukainen et al [45].…”
Section: Use Of the Monsu Planning Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When net present value was maximized, the net income of a cutting event was calculated as the difference between the roadside value of the harvested trees and harvesting costs. Harvesting costs were calculated by using time consumption functions for the harvester and forwarder (Rummukainen et al 1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functions of Rummukainen et al (1995) we used to calculate the harvester time of each harvested tree as a function of tree size (stem volume) and cutting type (clear felling or partial cutting). The time consumption of the forwarder depends on the total removal (m 3 /ha, converted into cubic meters per 100 meters of strip road, assuming a 20-m distance between strip roads), cutting type (partial cutting or clearfelling), terrain class (assumed normal) and forwarding distance (200 m assumed).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%