Work overload is related to increased risk of error during chemotherapy preparation

Abstract

Purpose Chemotherapy preparation units face peaks in activity leading to high workloads and increased stress. The present study evaluated the impact of work overloads on the safety and accuracy of manual preparations. Method Simulating overwork, operators were asked to produce increasing numbers of syringes (8, 16, and 24), with markers (phenylephrine or lidocaine), within 1 h, in an isolator, under aseptic conditions. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative criteria. Concentration deviations of < 5%, 5%–10%, 10%–30%, and >30% from the expected concentration were considered as accurate, weakly accurate, inaccurate, and wrong concentrations, respectively. Results Twenty-one pharmacy technicians and pharmacists carried out 63 preparation sessions (n = 1007 syringes). A statistically significant decrease in the manufacturing time for one syringe was observed when workload increased (p < 0.0001). Thirty-nine preparation errors were recorded: 30 wrong concentrations (deviation > 30%), 6 mislabeling, 2 wrong diluents, and 1 wrong drug. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean concentration accuracy of final preparations across the three workloads. The overall error rate increased with the number of preparations made in 1 h: 1.8% for 8 preparations, 2.7% for 16 preparations, and 5.4% for 24 preparations (p < 0.05). Conclusion Although pharmacy technicians and pharmacists were able to increase production speeds with no effect on mean concentration accuracy under stressful conditions, there were greater probability errors being made. These results should encourage actions to spread workloads out over the day to avoid peaks in activity.

How human activity impacted manufacturing non-compliances: A multivariate analysis in a centralized cytotoxic preparation unit

“…18 They found that it was clear that a large number of vials and a large volume of active solution, respectively related to low dosing and low concentration, induced a multiplication of manipulations, and increased the Several publications consider the link between workload and error at work, in medical sectors as in other sectors, such as aviation or car manufacturing chains, but none explore the relationship between day-to-day workload. [17][18][19] This also raises the question of maintaining quality when the workload exceeds the team's production capacity, including days when the workload is low.…”

Adoption of technological innovation in healthcare delivery: A social dynamic perspective

“…The introduction of new technology in the workplace requires effortful reconsideration and relearning process, which can introduce additional workload to staff in a high-stress and high-demands work environment. Work overload and fatigue can result in errors (Carrez et al, 2019;Dimova et al, 2018), which can increase the clinical burden and compromise the quality of patient care (Chase et al, 2008). Since patient care is core to healthcare staff's professional pride and identity, medical decision-makers must invest in resources to support the implementation of any new technology as a precaution to preventing negative attitudes about the technology from forming.…”

Impact of implementing the aseptic compounding management system, Medcura, on internal error rates within an oncology pharmacy aseptic unit: a mixed methods evaluation

“…This same study found that pharmacy staff more frequently attributed errors they made to a high workload. More recently a Swiss study evaluated the impact of simulated workloads on accuracy and error rates in manual aseptic preparations 1. Three 1 hour scenarios were designed to replicate low, medium and high workloads.…”