2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working Hours, Job Burnout, and Subjective Well-Being of Hospital Administrators: An Empirical Study Based on China’s Tertiary Public Hospitals

Abstract: (1) Purpose: To analyze the role of job burnout in connection with working hours and subjective well-being (SWB) among hospital administrators in China’s tertiary public hospitals. (2) Methods: A multi-stage, stratified, cluster random sampling method was used to select 443 hospital administrators in six tertiary public hospitals for study. The data were collected and analyzed using the working hours measuring scale, Maslach burnout, and the subjective well-being schedule. Pearson correlation, structural equat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural equation model was established and modified by AMOS 21.0, to certify the following hypotheses: (1) Perceived stress has a direct effect on job burnout; (2) Social support has a direct effect on job burnout; and (3) Perceived stress has an indirect effect on job burnout through social support. As shown in Table 5, the fitting index of the initial model (M1) was not ideal, so we revised the model according to the modification indices, which was adopted by Jia et al (2021). The model fitting indexes of final model (M2) (χ2/df = 1.421, RMSEA = 0.036, CFI = 0.996, NFI = 0.986, IFI = 0.996, TLI = 0.992 and GFI = 0.986) met the criteria of goodness‐of‐fit indices, demonstrating that the model was reasonable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The structural equation model was established and modified by AMOS 21.0, to certify the following hypotheses: (1) Perceived stress has a direct effect on job burnout; (2) Social support has a direct effect on job burnout; and (3) Perceived stress has an indirect effect on job burnout through social support. As shown in Table 5, the fitting index of the initial model (M1) was not ideal, so we revised the model according to the modification indices, which was adopted by Jia et al (2021). The model fitting indexes of final model (M2) (χ2/df = 1.421, RMSEA = 0.036, CFI = 0.996, NFI = 0.986, IFI = 0.996, TLI = 0.992 and GFI = 0.986) met the criteria of goodness‐of‐fit indices, demonstrating that the model was reasonable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to describe the degree of burnout objectively and accurately, a weighted burnout score with the cut‐off points was proposed, which was widely adopted in the previous studies (Jia et al, 2021; Xu et al, 2020). The equation was determined as “burnout = 0.4 * emotional exhaustion + 0.3 * depersonalization + 0.3 *reduced personal accomplishment.” The scores of eight items of reduced personal accomplishment were reversed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This association has been reported by previous studies [ 42 , 43 , 44 ], which is understandable. It is known that longer working hours are associated with burnout [ 45 , 46 ], which is a significant risk factor for MENM [ 47 , 48 , 49 ]. Another explanation may be that medical professionals may be fatigued by working long hours, and fatigued people are more likely to make mistakes while they are working [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, previous studies have examined that COVID-19 may infect the farm employees from livestock [5][6][7], so these livestock feeders need to face daily infections from livestock, which is the second source of Indeed, to obtain a superior competitive advantage, livestock production agribusinesses vendors must motivate their livestock feeders to use their full energy for performance (e.g., TP) and should also reduce their negative behaviors (e.g., WB) due to work pressure at the same time [8] to achieve the goal of sustainable work. Previous empirical studies have investigated the organizational enhance variables that increase positive behaviors [9][10][11] and organizational intervention variables that reduce negative employee behaviors [12][13][14]. However, few studies focus on how a single variable (e.g., EI) can simultaneously handle the positive and negative behaviors of feeders in agribusiness.…”
Section: Introduction 1backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%