2015
DOI: 10.22499/2.6503.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WRF and SFIRE simulations of the Layman fuel reduction burn

Abstract: The Layman fire commenced as a routine fuel reduction burn in southwest Western Australia in October 2010. Late morning on the day following ignition, the fire was more active than fire management officers had expected under the prevailing conditions of wind, temperature and relative humidity in the local eucalypt forest fuels. A convective smoke plume developed over the fire, extending to a height of approximately 4000 m. Traditional measures for assessing fire behaviour gave no indication of the extent of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also cases where a relatively weak, non-frontal or seabreeze wind change can still dramatically affect fire behaviour (e.g. Peace et al 2015aPeace et al , 2015b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also cases where a relatively weak, non-frontal or seabreeze wind change can still dramatically affect fire behaviour (e.g. Peace et al 2015aPeace et al , 2015b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kilmore East fire was a fire complex located almost 100 km north of Melbourne responsible for 119 fatalities and which burnt more than 125,000 ha. Although different in detail, the approach taken to modeling the Kilmore East fire complex is similar to Coen (), Coen et al (), Filippi et al (), Kochanski et al (), Coen and Riggan (), Coen and Schroeder (), and Peace, Mattner, et al (), and Peace, McCaw, et al (). Moreover, the current paper builds on the earlier study by Engel et al (), who forecast the meteorology of Black Saturday with a high‐resolution nested simulation with the UM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%