1974
DOI: 10.1154/s0376030800006698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-Ray Analysis for Electron Beam Enhancement in the Plasma Focus Device*

Abstract: The plasma focus device, a form of linear pinch discharge, produces an intense x-ray and neutron (D2) burst from a magnetically heated dense plasma. Rapidly changing magnetic fields at pinch time generate large axial electric fields which accelerate electrons and ions. In the experiments reported here the x-ray production during the plasma pinch of a 96 kilojoule (at 20 kV) plasma focus device was measured.The purpose of these experiments was to evaluate the energy in accelerated electrons in the plasma focus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11. The electron spectra appear to harden with increasing IMB where the absolute value of the exponent, |x|, scales as I^3 S °\ These results are consistent with the hard-X-ray data where the absolute value of the electron beam energy power law ranged from 3.5-4.0 for 20 kJ devices [16,18] to 2.4-4.0 for a 57.3 kJ device [17], and down to 2.0 for a 375 kJ device [19]. Thus the results from the 6-12.5 kJ device reported here fit these X-ray data fairly well although these new results are less ambiguous, being the result of a direct measurement.…”
Section: Fig 11 Observed Scaling Of the Power Law Exponent X(dn/de « ...supporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…11. The electron spectra appear to harden with increasing IMB where the absolute value of the exponent, |x|, scales as I^3 S °\ These results are consistent with the hard-X-ray data where the absolute value of the electron beam energy power law ranged from 3.5-4.0 for 20 kJ devices [16,18] to 2.4-4.0 for a 57.3 kJ device [17], and down to 2.0 for a 375 kJ device [19]. Thus the results from the 6-12.5 kJ device reported here fit these X-ray data fairly well although these new results are less ambiguous, being the result of a direct measurement.…”
Section: Fig 11 Observed Scaling Of the Power Law Exponent X(dn/de « ...supporting
confidence: 81%
“…1) are observed by direct methods to have the same power law energy dependence at a device current at pinch time, IMB, of 560 kA. The scaling of the absolute value of the exponent of the power law was found (for electrons) to decrease with increasing IMB (hardening of the spectrum) and the values were found to be consistent with the electron energy spectra inferred from hard X-ray spectral measurements on several other devices [16][17][18][19]. It is interesting that power law spectra of similar exponents have also been observed in a double inverse pinch [41 ], cosmic rays [57], and solar flares [58],…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The produced X-ray radiation by the interaction of electrons with anode tip has been used indirectly to measure electron beam energy spectrum. However, direct methods of measurement using diagnostics, such as filters (Smith et al 1985), Rogowski coils, Faraday cups (Stygar et al 1982;Smith et al 1985), self-bias Faraday cups (Neog and Mohanty 2007), magnetic electron energy analyzers (Gullickson and Barlett 1975;Stygar et al 1982;Smith et al 1985;Hirano et al 1990;Zhang et al 2005), and Cherenkov detectors (Jakubowski et al 1996(Jakubowski et al , 1997(Jakubowski et al , 1998Sadowski and Scholz 2003), have also been cited in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%