2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46547-0_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

YAGO: A Multilingual Knowledge Base from Wikipedia, Wordnet, and Geonames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
171
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
171
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-Aspect Entity Features. Existing KGs Suchanek et al, 2008;Rebele et al, 2016) provide multi-aspect information of entities. In this section, we mainly focus on the following three aspects: topological connections, relations, and attributes.…”
Section: Cross-lingual Graph Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-Aspect Entity Features. Existing KGs Suchanek et al, 2008;Rebele et al, 2016) provide multi-aspect information of entities. In this section, we mainly focus on the following three aspects: topological connections, relations, and attributes.…”
Section: Cross-lingual Graph Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freebase (Bollacker et al, 2008(Bollacker et al, , 2007, later acquired by Google and dissolved in Google Knowledge Graph, mines resources such as Wikipedia and enables a collaborative environment to handle the organization, representation, and integration of large and diverse data sets, thus facilitating continuous growth. On the other hand, Yago (Rebele et al, 2016) follows the Resource Description Framework (RDF) (World Wide Web Consortium, 2014) triplets to store relational data mined from Wikipedia, WordNet, and GeoNames and filtered to fit predefined relational structures.…”
Section: Semantic Representation Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large semantic network is normally composed of a library of semantic entities (e.g., words or phrases) and their semantic relations, which are often statistically or linguistically "learned" based on collaboratively edited and accumulated knowledge databases, such as Wikipedia. Over the past decade, semantic networks have been enabled by the development of large-scale knowledge basis and ontology databases, such as WordNet (Fellbaum, 2012;Miller et al, 1990), ConceptNet (Speer et al, 2016;Speer & Havasi, 2012;Speer & Lowry-Duda, 2017), never-ending language learning (NeLL) (Mitchell et al, 2015), Freebase (Bollacker et al, 2008(Bollacker et al, , 2007 and Yago (Rebele et al, 2016), for various general applications in text data mining, natural language processing (NLP), knowledge discovery, information retrieval and artificial intelligence. Likewise, the proprietary Google Knowledge Graph 1 provides the backbone behind Google's semantic search and answer features for web searches, Gmail, and Google Assistant, for example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to produce cartographic visualizations, the necessity to adapt to different contexts [3] and to complement existing resources with a precise historical gazetteer [7] has been highlighted, as combined approaches lead to more complete or finer knowledge bases [14]. Such databases of geographic locations featuring coordinates and relevant metadata exist, but their development is challenging [16] even for 20th century Europe [12].…”
Section: Description 21 Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%