2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-016-0437-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yielding of rockfill in relative humidity-controlled triaxial experiments

Abstract: The paper reports the results of suction controlled triaxial tests performed on compacted samples of two well graded granular materials in the range of coarse sand-medium gravel particle sizes: a quartzitic slate and a hard limestone. The evolution of grain size distributions is discussed. Dilatancy rules were investigated. Dilatancy could be described in terms of stress ratio, plastic work input and average confining stress. The shape of the yield locus in a triaxial plane was established by different experim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This state-dependent behaviour was also observed in the triaxial tests on rockfill materials used in Guanyinyan dam that will be introduced in the next section. Furthermore, compared with the fully saturated rockfill materials, a more obvious state-dependent behaviour was observed for unsaturated rockfills in the relative humidity-controlled triaxial tests [7,16]. The rockfills subjected to the larger suction exhibited more remarkable strain-softening and dilatancy at a low confining pressure or with a small initial void ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This state-dependent behaviour was also observed in the triaxial tests on rockfill materials used in Guanyinyan dam that will be introduced in the next section. Furthermore, compared with the fully saturated rockfill materials, a more obvious state-dependent behaviour was observed for unsaturated rockfills in the relative humidity-controlled triaxial tests [7,16]. The rockfills subjected to the larger suction exhibited more remarkable strain-softening and dilatancy at a low confining pressure or with a small initial void ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Compared with the abundant creep tests performed with various sands (Kuwano and Jardine 2002;Lade et al 2009;Karimpour and Lade 2010;Karimpour and Lade 2013), experiments on the time-dependent behavior of rockfill materials are considerably less (AnhDan et al 2006;Zhang et al 2017;Alonso et al 2016;Fu et al 2018b). However, it is reasonable to postulate that the time-dependent behavior of rockfill materials is similar to that of sands.…”
Section: Previous Experimental Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle breakage may also occur under a constant stress state in a delayed manner, leading to the so-called creep strains (Oldecop and Alonso 2007;Zhang et al 2017;Lade et al 2009;Kwok and Bolton 2013;Karimpour and Lade 2010;Fu et al 2018a). For a particular rockfill, the amount of creep strains depends not only on the packing density (Bauer et al 2012) and the moisture content (Alonso et al 2016;Bauer 2009), but also on the stress state (Cheng and Ding 2004;Fu et al 2018a) and the stress history (Zhang et al 2017;Lade et al 2009). On the other hand, the deformation behavior of materials during loading may also be altered by previous creep histories, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past research has established that grain crushing is influenced by many factors. These factors are ranged from soil grain characteristics such as soil particle strength (Varadarajan et al 2006) angularity and morphology (Karatza et al, 2019;Xiao et al, 2019), or soil matrix properties such as gradation (Honkanadavar and Sharma, 2014), porosity (Hyodo et al, 2016), and moisture content (Alonso et al, 2016), and anisotropy (Hattamleh et al 2010, Hattamleh et al 2013) and external factors such as induced stress (Hattamleh et al 2010), loading duration (Fu et al, 2019), and loading rate (Huang et al, 2017 and;Parab et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%