2020
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young adult outcomes of childhood prophylaxis for severe hemophilia A: results of the Joint Outcome Continuation Study

Abstract: The Joint Outcome Study (JOS), a randomized controlled trial, demonstrated that children with severe hemophilia A (HA) initiating prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII) prior to age 2.5 years had reduced joint damage at age 6 years compared with those treated with episodic FVIII for bleeding. The Joint Outcome Continuation Study (JOS-C) evaluated early vs delayed prophylaxis effects on long-term joint health, following JOS participants to age 18 years in an observational, partially retrospective study. Index joint m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
100
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These patients are also at risk of FVIII or FIX alloantibody formation (inhibitors), which complicate both the approach to prophylaxis as well as bleed management. In our older children and adult patients, the infusion frequency of clotting factor products needed to provide adequate factor activity to eliminate (or even minimize) bleed events remains a barrier to consistent adherence, and an ongoing decline in joint health is observed albeit at a markedly slower pace than without prophylaxis 120 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These patients are also at risk of FVIII or FIX alloantibody formation (inhibitors), which complicate both the approach to prophylaxis as well as bleed management. In our older children and adult patients, the infusion frequency of clotting factor products needed to provide adequate factor activity to eliminate (or even minimize) bleed events remains a barrier to consistent adherence, and an ongoing decline in joint health is observed albeit at a markedly slower pace than without prophylaxis 120 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pediatric patients present both a unique challenge and an opportunity as prevention of joint bleeding, particularly at the youngest ages, greatly improves overall joint health 1,120 . Development of therapeutic strategies that are easily administered and provide robust hemostatic protection are appealing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of bands can be adapted to each system based on preference with clinicians and patients. In lower bands, PWH with lower levels of factor may still not need prophylactic treatment, although it may be argued that sub‐clinical bleeding may still occur 31 . The details in examples such as this could be agreed to by a Delphi‐like process to achieve expert consensus until population data are available 32 .…”
Section: Reimbursement Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, a clinical practice guideline was developed at the University of Colorado Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center to optimize the identification of hemophilia patients eligible for prophylaxis. For patients with baseline factor <2%, full‐dose prophylaxis is recommended by 18‐30 months, 8 or earlier if there is clinically symptomatic bleeding. If the baseline factor level is ≥ 2%, initiation of prophylaxis is recommended when there is: (a) >1 joint bleed in any 12‐month period, (b) participation in high‐risk sports, (c) frequent or persistent joint pain not otherwise explained, (d) any single joint HJHS increased by ≥2 points over 12 months, (e) any single joint HJHS ≥ 5, (f) total HJHS ≥ 18, or (g) patient/parent preference.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%