Zirconia and Titanium Implant Abutments for Single-Tooth Implant Prostheses After 5 Years of Function in Posterior Regions

Lops, Diego; Bressan, Eriberto; Chiapasco, Matteo; Rossi, Alessandro; Romeo, Eugenio

doi:10.11607/jomi.2668

Cited by 71 publications

(89 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Zirconia has better mechanical properties than all of the previously introduced ceramics 3) . Furthermore, much clinical research into zirconia-based all-ceramic restorations has confirmed that zirconia ceramics exhibit high stability as a frame work material for full coverage crowns [4][5][6][7] , fixed partial dentures (FPDs) 5,[8][9][10][11] , and implant abutments [12][13][14] . It has often been reported that full-coverage zirconia ceramic restoration and FPDs might not require adhesive cementation and that they can be cemented with conventional cements, including zinc phosphate 4,6,8,11) or glass ionomer cement 5,10) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of silane and phosphate primers on the adhesive performance of atri-n-butylborane initiated luting agent bonded to zirconia

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of primers on the bond strength and durability of an acrylic resin luting agent bonded to zirconia. Disk specimens were fabricated from zirconia partially stabilized with yttrium oxide. The disks were primed with one of the following materials: Alloy Primer (AP), Ceramic Primer (CP), Liquid A of the Porcelain Liner M (PLM-A), Liquid B of Porcelain Liner M (PLM-B), Porcelain Liner M (PLM-A+PLM-B), Monobond Plus (MP), and mixture of AP and PLM-B. The specimens were bonded with a tri-n-butylborane (TBB)-initiated luting agent. The shear bond strengths were determined both before and after thermocycling. The results were statistically analyzed with a non-parametric procedure. The highest post-thermocycling bond strength was generated from the groups primed with MP, CP, and AP. It can be concluded that the application of three phosphate primers is recommended for bonding the zirconia with the TBB-initiated luting agent.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of silane and phosphate primers on the adhesive performance of atri-n-butylborane initiated luting agent bonded to zirconia

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3) Results of the Effect of metallic and nonmetallic implant abutment on rescission index :-Examination of rescission index around Zirconia and Titanium abutments was reported in four studies. showing mean values at Zirconia abutments ranged from 0 to 0.3 and at Titanium abutments ranged from 0 to 0.4, after 6months the mean of recession index around Zirconia abutment was 0.16 while for titanium abutment was 0.27 (15).later 1 year follow up the mean of recession index around Zirconia abutment was zero while for titanium abutment was 0.04 (12) , furthermore increasing the recession was reported after 2 year follow up for Zirconia to range from 0.3 and was 0.4 for titanium abutment (10),additionally the mean of recession index around Zirconia abutment ranged from 0.1-0.3 whereas for titanium abutment was from 0.3-0.4 after 3y and 5y follow up (8,11) with no significant differences between them .…”

Section: Results Of the Effect Of Metallic And Nonmetallic Implant Abmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…This action can be claimed; though, patient bias is avoidable through uncontrolled prospective clinical trials. Therefore, the longest follow-up included was 5 years long (10,11). In general, the results of both abutment materials showed only minor statistically significant differences.…”

Section: Discussion:-mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Biological Complication of Implant Abutment Materials.

Radwan¹,

Mokhtar²,

Elnagar³

et al. 2017

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:The goal of this review was to identify the biological complication of implant abutment materials in relative to alveolar bone around implant supported superstructure. Methodology: An electronic database search and further a manual searching was directed to detect RCTs, and cohort studies that give evidence about different abutment materials complication. Pocket depth, amount of rescission and crestal bone loss were attributed to alveolar bone loss. Results: fourteen clinical studies were detected from an initial search of 107 studies and the extraction of the analyzing data were tabled according to complication output. Pocket probing depth were documented in eight studies, PPD around Zirconium implant abutments was 3.2 mm versus 3.4 mm for Titanium abutment. Five studies examined the recession index for Zirconium and Titanium implant abutments. The RI ranged from 0 to 0.4 at Titanium implant abutments and 0 to 0.3 at Zirconium implant abutments. For the alveolar loss around Zirconia implant abutment was stated to differ from 0.2-1.48 and 0.3-1.43mm at Titanium abutments. Conclusion: The data reported in this systematic review did not give an evidence for the complication regarding all ceramic versus metallic implant abutment. However, it can be concluded that the assessment of the randomized clinical trials did not provide an absolute decision for the choice of ceramic or metallic as implant abutment material relative to alveolar bone response. The meta-analysis presented a statistically significant difference between abutment material with superiority for the all ceramic abutments over metallic abutment

show abstract

“…The following inclusion criteria 17 were considered: The presence of at least two posterior implants on two sides in the #6 or #7 areas in the same jaw, whose clinical success had been confirmed; the presence of at least 1 mm of attached gingiva around the implants; a maximum gingival thickness of 3 mm in the implant neck area; and a minimum age of 18 years.…”

Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Proinflammatory Cytokine Levels in Gingival Crevicular Fluid around Dental Implants with Ceramic and Titanium Abutments

Negahdari

Rahbar

Fakhrzadeh

et al. 2017

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Considering the high success rate of osseointegration, there is ever-increasing use of dental implants. The mechanisms and biologic response of peri-implant tissues are different depending on the biocompatibility of the implant material. The aim of this study was to compare the proinflammatory cytokine levels in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) around dental implants with ceramic and titanium abutments. Materials and methods:All the patients with dental implants referring to two private offices of two prosthodontists from June to August 2016 were examined in relation to implant health, and eligible subjects, based on inclusion criteria, were included in this study with a slit-mouth design. In this context, on one side titanium implants and, on the other side, ceramic implants were used. Samples were collected from the peri-implant sulcus in each patient and sent to the immunology laboratory for determination of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1β proinflammatory cytokine levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Data were analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 16. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results:The results showed lower levels of IL-1β and IL-6 in the GCF around ceramic abutments compared with titanium implants. In addition, statistical comparison between IL-6 and IL-1β levels showed higher levels of IL-6 around titanium and ceramic abutments compared with IL-1β levels. Comparison of Proinflammatory Cytokine Levels in Conclusion:Based on the results of this study, the human body immune response to ceramic abutments is much better than that to titanium implants.Clinical significance: Considering that proinflammatory cytokine levels in GCF around ceramic abutments are lower than titanium ones, ceramic abutments are preferred for clinical usage.

show abstract

Zirconia and Titanium Implant Abutments for Single-Tooth Implant Prostheses After 5 Years of Function in Posterior Regions

Cited by 71 publications

References 0 publications

Effect of silane and phosphate primers on the adhesive performance of atri-n-butylborane initiated luting agent bonded to zirconia

Effect of silane and phosphate primers on the adhesive performance of atri-n-butylborane initiated luting agent bonded to zirconia

The Biological Complication of Implant Abutment Materials.

Comparison of Proinflammatory Cytokine Levels in Gingival Crevicular Fluid around Dental Implants with Ceramic and Titanium Abutments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About