SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009 2009
DOI: 10.1190/1.3255083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ZTEM airborne tipper AFMAG test survey over a magmatic copper‐nickel target at Axis Lake in northern Saskatchewan

Abstract: An airborne AFMAG demonstration test survey was conducted using the ZTEM™ tipper electromagnetic prospecting system over a known magmatic copper-nickel occurrence in northern Saskatchewan, Canada. These tests were conducted in early 2008 and were flown to test the system's capability to detect the conductive but relatively weakly mineralized sulphide deposits and to define potential extensions at depth. The AFMAG method utilizes naturally occurring audio telluric fields from worldwide sferic activity as its pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was developed through the 1980s (Labson et al, 1985), but technological advances minimizing electric noise from the aircraft and enabling the monitoring of sensor position have only recently allowed large, high-quality data sets to be collected. Applications have included base metal and unconformity uranium 3D ZTEM and MT model of an epithermal system B5 exploration (Lo and Zang, 2008;Legault et al, 2009), as well as geothermal exploration (Devriese et al, 2012). The 2D and 3D inversion techniques developed for MT or controlled-source airborne methods (Siripunvaraporn and Egbert, 2009;Holtham and Oldenburg, 2010;Egbert and Kelbert, 2012) can be applied to ZTEM data to derive models of electric resistivity.…”
Section: Geophysical Methods and Data Collection Mt And Ztemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was developed through the 1980s (Labson et al, 1985), but technological advances minimizing electric noise from the aircraft and enabling the monitoring of sensor position have only recently allowed large, high-quality data sets to be collected. Applications have included base metal and unconformity uranium 3D ZTEM and MT model of an epithermal system B5 exploration (Lo and Zang, 2008;Legault et al, 2009), as well as geothermal exploration (Devriese et al, 2012). The 2D and 3D inversion techniques developed for MT or controlled-source airborne methods (Siripunvaraporn and Egbert, 2009;Holtham and Oldenburg, 2010;Egbert and Kelbert, 2012) can be applied to ZTEM data to derive models of electric resistivity.…”
Section: Geophysical Methods and Data Collection Mt And Ztemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The airborne z-axis tipper electromagnetic (ZTEM) technique (Lo and Zang, 2008;Legault et al, 2009) measures natural low-frequency (30-720 Hz) EM signals, and it is used for deep mineral exploration extending to depths of up to 2 km in ideal circumstances and resistive terrain, depending on the average electric resistivity of the area (Spies, 1989). The method is closely related to the groundbased magnetotelluric (MT) method, which also uses natural EM signals and has been applied to a wide variety of targets from near-surface to deeper mantle studies (Bastani et al, 2009;Bertrand et al, 2012;Rippe et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case in which a test site is not readily available, Yin and Hodges (2009) suggested using a wire loop laid out on the ground as a test conductor. Legault (2009a, b) presented two case histories of ZTEM, a heliborne AFMAG system. In one case, an anomalous response was associated with a graphitic conductor at least 500 m deep; in the second case the system was able to map large conductive structures associated with a copper-nickel deposit.…”
Section: Case Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Z-axis Tipper EM (ZTEM) system, developed by Geotech Ltd (Legault et al, 2009), measures the tipper of the MT field in both the along-line (X) and cross-line (Y) polarizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%