1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(05)80051-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol discrimination in rats as a model for cannabis intoxication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, these effects serve as an animal model of the subjective effects of marijuana in humans (Balster and Prescott, 1992). In drug discrimination studies, combined administration of THC and CBD has resulted in varied effects including no effect, lack of antagonism, or time course potentiation.…”
Section: Cbd and Thc Interactions In Drug Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, these effects serve as an animal model of the subjective effects of marijuana in humans (Balster and Prescott, 1992). In drug discrimination studies, combined administration of THC and CBD has resulted in varied effects including no effect, lack of antagonism, or time course potentiation.…”
Section: Cbd and Thc Interactions In Drug Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the THC drug discrimination represents an excellent model of the subjective intoxication produced by marijuana (Balster and Prescott, 1992), THC has other types of stimulus effects that may not be assessed adequately in this procedure. Specifically, THC may produce rewarding or aversive effects.…”
Section: Place Conditioning Effects Of Thc and Cbdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence or absence of discriminable interoceptive CNS effects of a compound can be evaluated in animals with two-lever choice drug-discrimination procedures. Discriminative-stimulus effects of THC in animals show a high degree of pharmacological specificity and provide a reliable animal model of subjective effects of marijuana or THC in humans (Balster and Prescott, 1992;Barrett et al, 1995;Wiley et al, 1995b). Usually, only other cannabinoids that are active at central cannabinoid CB1 receptors reliably produce THC-like discriminative effects in animals (Barrett et al, 1995;Wiley et al, 1995b;Jarbe et al, 2001).…”
Section: Subjective and Motivational Effects Of Cannabinoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…route of administration, which does not favor rapid entry into the brain before metabolic breakdown, may explain the difficulties encountered in demonstrating THC-like discriminative effects of anandamide in animals. Among noncannabinoid drugs, only pentobarbital and diazepam have been found to produce partial generalization to a cannabinoid training stimulus (Mokler et al, 1986;Balster and Prescott, 1992;Barrett et al, 1995;Wiley and Martin, 1999;Alici and Appel, 2004). Since this effect of diazepam is not blocked by the cannabinoid CB 1 receptor antagonist rimonabant (SR 141716), it is probably mediated by an interaction through the GABAergic system (Wiley and Martin, 1999).…”
Section: Subjective and Motivational Effects Of Cannabinoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies employing this model have demonstrated that activation of CB1-Rs induces interoceptive effects in gerbils , pigeons , rodents (Balster and Prescott, 1992), and monkeys (Wiley et al, 1995). Cannabinoid DS effects show high pharmacological specificity, as they are selectively blocked by CB1-R antagonists, although a partial overlap has been reported with diazepam (Mokler et al, 1986;Wiley and Martin, 1999), phencyclidine (Doty et al, 1994), and pentobarbital (Alici and Appel, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%