BackgroundReal-time PCR is an efficient tool to measure transcripts and provide valuable quantitative information on gene expression of preimplantation stage embryos. Finding valid reference genes for normalization is essential to interpret the real-time PCR results accurately, and understand the biological dynamics during early development. The use of reference genes also known as housekeeping genes is the most widely applied approach. However, the different genes are not systematically compared, and as a result there is no uniformity between studies in selecting the reference gene. The goals of this study were to compare a wide selection of the most commonly used housekeeping genes in mouse oocytes and preimplantation stage embryos produced under different culture conditions, and select the best stable genes for normalization of gene expression data.ResultsQuantitative real time PCR method was used to evaluate 12 commonly used housekeeping genes (Actb, Gapdh, H2afz, Hprt, Ppia, Ubc, Eef1e1, Tubb4, Hist2h2aa1, Tbp, Bmp7, Polr2a) in multiple individual embryos representing six different developmental stages. The results were analysed, and stable genes were selected using the geNorm software. The expression pattern was almost similar despite differences in the culture system; however, the transcript levels were affected by culture conditions. The genes have showed various stabilities, and have been ranked accordingly.ConclusionCompared to earlier studies with similar objectives, we used a unique approach in analysing larger number of genes, comparing embryo samples derived in vivo or in vitro, analysing the expression in the early and late maternal to zygote transition periods separately, and using multiple individual embryos. Based on detailed quantification, pattern analyses and using the geNorm application, we found Ppia, H2afz and Hprt1 genes to be the most stable across the different stages and culture conditions, while Actb, the classical housekeeping gene, showed the least stability. We recommend the use of the geometric averages of those three genes for normalization in mouse preimplantation-stage gene expression studies.
Background: The surge in the number of gene expression studies and tendencies to increase the quality of analysis have necessitated the identification of stable reference genes. Although rabbits are classical experimental model animals, stable reference genes have not been identified for normalization. The aims of this study were to compare the expression profiles of the widely used reference genes in rabbit oocytes and preimplantation stage embryos, and to select and validate stable ones to use as reference.
The analysis of differences in gene expression, responding to cryopreservation may explain some of the observed differences in further development of the preimplantation stage embryos. The aim of this study was to create a link, for the first time, between morphological/developmental observations and gene activity changes following cryopreservation of embryos. Efficiency of two vitrification methods, solid surface and in-straw vitrifications for pronuclear-stage mouse zygotes and 8-cell stage mouse embryos was compared based on morphological survival, blastocyst formation, and changes in embryonic gene expression. Both stages of embryos were vitrified by SSV using 35% ethylene glycol (EG) for vitrification solution (VS) and in-straw vitrification using 40% EG for VS. No significant differences were found between immediate survival rates of embryos vitrified by SSV and in-straw vitrification in both stages. Blastocyst rates were significantly higher with SSV and not significantly different from that of control. These results showed that SSV was more efficient than in-straw vitrification. Treatment with cytochalasin-b did not improve cryosurvival during SSV. The quantification of selected gene transcripts from single embryo (6 embryos/treatment group) were carried out by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. It was performed by adding 1/8 of each embryo cDNA to the PCR mix containing the specific primers to amplify housekeeping gene (beta-actin), heat shock protein gene (Hsp70), genes related to oxidative stress (MnSOD and CuSOD), cold stress (CirpB, Rbm3), and cell-cycle arrest (Trp53). We found upregulation of all six stress-related genes at 3 hr post-warming in pronuclear stage embryos. Expression of these genes showed much higher level (2-33-fold) in in-straw vitrification than in in vitro control embryos. In SSV-treated embryos we could detect only slight changes (0.3-2-fold). At 10 hr post-warming, all genes were downregulated in embryos vitrified by in-straw method. In SSV-treated group expression of Hsp70 showed slight increase and Trp53 showed decrease. In contrast to pronuclear stage, there was no clear pattern of gene expression changes after vitrification in 8-cell stage embryos. Several genes were upregulated both at 3 and 10 hr post-warming. Moreover, we found upregulation of beta-actin gene which we expected to use as a reference gene in in-straw treated embryos in both 3 and 10 hr post-warming, while in pronuclear stage embryos and in SSV treatment there was no effect on beta-actin expression level. There was no difference in gene expression between blastocysts developed from fresh or vitrified embryos. In conclusion, the real-time RT-PCR method from single embryo opened new opportunities for the understranding of molecular events following cryopreservation. The upregulation of stress-related genes at 3 hr post-warming in pronuclear stage embryos might have been an early indicator of reduced viability following in-straw vitrification in good correlation with the developmental data to blastocyst stage.
The aim of the present study was to compare real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and end-point PCR with respect to their suitability for the analysis of gene expression in samples in which the number of cells is limited; for example, in studies of preimplantation embryonic development and to determine the variability of the real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay. The sensitivity, dynamic range and precision of both PCR systems were compared using a single mouse liver cDNA standard. The real-time system was 100-fold more sensitive than the end-point system and had a dynamic range of more than four orders of magnitude. The linear range for end-point PCR extended for two orders of magnitude using a fixed end-point of 31 cycles. The percentage standard error of the mean based on 30 replicates was 0.14% of the threshold cycle (Ct) value for the real-time system and 6.8% for the end-point fluorescence intensity. The coefficients of variation (CV) for reverse transcription combined with real-time analysis and the complete gene expression protocol consisting of mRNA isolation, reverse transcription and real-time PCR analysis were 0.6% and 1.4% of the Ct values, respectively. The present paper details, for the first time, measurement of the biological variation of individual mammalian oocytes. The CV was 1.8% of the Ct value for expression analysis of six bovine oocytes. The results are discussed in relation to the analysis of gene expression in preimplantation embryo development.
Real-time PCR has the potential to accurately quantify the mRNA level of selected genes in single cells and individual pre-implantation-stage embryos. The goal of our study was to examine the variations in gene expression within individual embryos of the same stage and between embryos of the same stage but from different sources. In our study, we determined expression level of the 7 most commonly used housekeeping genes in 8-cell-stage mouse embryos produced under different culture conditions. Messenger RNA of 6 embryos each that was derived in vivo, or cultured in vitro from the zygote stage, or derived from oocytes activated parthenogenetically and developed in vitro were extracted individually followed by reverse transcription into cDNA. Optimized real-time PCR was performed for cytoplasmic beta-actin (Actb), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh), H2A histone family, member Z (H2afz), hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase 1 (Hprt1), ubiquitin C (Ubc), peptidylprolyl isomerase A (cyclophilin A) (Ppia), and eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 epsilon 1 (Eef1e1) genes. The results were analyzed, and the percentage standard error of the mean relative expression value was compared for all genes. All 7 genes were presented above the detection limit in all samples. One or two individual embryos showed 2- to 4-fold higher mRNA levels than the average for all genes in the group. The embryos cultured in vitro showed much higher expression levels of H2afz, Ppia, and Eef1e1 genes than those in the in vivo group. The parthenogenetic group was similar to the in vivo group in expression of Actb, H2afz, Hprt, and Eef1e1 genes, but showed significant differences (P < 0.05; Student's t-test) compared to the in vitro group (Table 1). The percent standard error of the mean decreased gradually as the number of samples was increased. The 6 individual embryos in similar groups showed relatively low variability compared to embryos at similar stage but produced in different conditions. Interestingly, the parthenogenetic embryos showed a level of gene expression comparable to that of the in vivo ones, notwithstanding their culture in vitro. In conclusion, morphological observations and similarity in developmental stage alone cannot guarantee the uniformity of embryo samples, and a minimum of 4–6 replicates per treatment is needed. Moreover, we showed that culture condition itself has an effect on housekeeping gene expression, which, if neglected, might result in misinterpretation of data. Table 1.Relative expression values of the different culture groups (mean ±SE; n =6 embryos) This work was supported by EU FP6 (MEXT-CT-2003-509582 and 518240), Wellcome Trust (Grant No. 070246), and Hungarian National Science Fund (OTKA) (Grant No. T046171).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.