The extent and progression of exposure to feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) virus in the cheetah, Acinonyx jubatus, was monitored by a worldwide serological survey with indirect fluorescent antibody titers to coronavirus. The indirect fluorescent antibody assay was validated by Western blots, which showed that all indirect fluorescent antibody-positive cheetah sera detected both domestic cat and cheetah coronavirus structural proteins. There was a poor correlation between indirect fluorescent antibody results and the presence of coronaviruslike particles in cheetah feces, suggesting that electron microscopic detection of shed particles may not be an easily interpreted diagnostic parameter for FIP disease. Low, but verifiable (by Western blots [immunoblots]) antibody titers against coronavirus were detected in eight free-ranging cheetahs from east Africa as well as from captive cheetahs throughout the world. Of 20 North American cheetah facilities screened, 9 had cheetahs with measurable antibodies to feline coronavirus. Five facilities showed patterns of an ongoing epizootic. Retrospective FIP virus titers of an FIP outbreak in a cheetah-breeding facility in Oregon were monitored over a 5-year period and are interpreted here in terms of clinical disease progression. During that outbreak the morbidity was over 90% and the mortality was 60%, far greater than any previously reported epizootic of FIP in any cat species. Age of infection was a significant risk factor in this epizootic, with infants (less than 3 months old) displaying signfficantly higher risk for mortality than subadults or adults. Based upon these observations, empirical generalizations are drawn which address epidemiologic concerns for cheetahs in the context of this lethal infectious agent.
An epizootic of feline infectious peritonitis in a captive cheetah population during 1982-1983 served to focus attention on the susceptibility of the cheetah (Acinoyx jubatus) to infectious disease. Subsequent observations based upon seroepidemiological surveys and electron microscopy of fecal material verified that cheetahs were indeed capable of being infected by coronaviruses, which were antigenically related to coronaviruses affecting domestic cats, i.e. feline infectious peritonitis virus/feline enteric coronavirus. Coincident with the apparent increased susceptibility of the cheetah to infectious diseases, were observations that the cheetah was genetically unusual insofar as large amounts of enzyme-encoding loci were monomorphic, and that unrelated cheetahs were capable of accepting allogenic skin grafts. These data provided the basis for a hypothesis that the cheetah, through intensive inbreeding, had become more susceptible to viral infections as a result of genetic homogeneity.
Abstract. Canine distemper virus (CDV) was previously considered to have a host range restricted to the canid family. In 1994, the virus was associated with sporadic outbreaks of distemper in captive felids. However, after severe mortality occurred in the Serengeti lions (Panthera leo), attention became focused on the pathogenesis of the virus and a concerted effort was made to identify the virus as CDV or a closely related feline morbillivirus. The present study was designed to explore the susceptibility of ferrets to challenge with two morbilliviruses isolated from lions and the protective effects of a modified-live mink distemper vaccine. Because mortality in ferrets infected with pathogenic CDV approaches 100%, the ferret was selected as a test animal. Two strains of lion morbillivirus were used as a challenge, A92-27/20 (California lion isolate) and A94-11/13 (Serengeti lion isolate). The two strains of lion morbillivirus were antigenically related to CDV (Rockborn strain), and ferrets were susceptible to both of the viruses when inoculated intraperitoneally. The inoculated ferrets were anorectic at 5-6 days postinoculation (PI), exhibited oculonasal discharge at 9-12 days PI, and became moribund at 12-22 days PI. Severe bilateral conjunctivitis was the typical clinical sign. Inclusion bodies characteristic of morbillivirus (eosinophilic, intranuclear, and intracytoplasmic) were distributed in many epithelial cells, including those of the skin, conjunctiva, gallbladder, liver, pancreas, stomach, trachea, lung, urinary bladder, and kidney. Virus was reisolated from selected lung tissues collected at necropsy and identified by CDV-specific immunofluorescence. Ferrets vaccinated with the mink distemper vaccine (Onderstepoort strain) were protected from challenge with the two lion strains, adding further support to the premise that the viruses are closely related to CDV.Key words: Canine distemper virus; ferrets; lions; morbillivirus; Mustela putorius furo; Panthera leo; pathogenesis; vaccination; virus biotype.The host range of canine distemper virus (CDV) has come under intense scrutiny over the past few years in part because of observations of antigenically related morbilliviruses associated with or causing disease in a variety of terrestrial and marine mammals. 4,9,11,12,20,30 Sources of confusion regarding the host range of CDV in felids have arisen from disparate reports of the lack of CDV disease in domestic cats and the occurrence of fatal CDV-like disease in captive and free-roaming large felids. 4,[8][9][10][26][27][28]31,34,37,45 The debate regarding CDV interspecies transmission (canid to felid) versus the existence of a unique feline morbillivirus strain antigenically related to CDV has not been fully resolved. 35 It has been postulated, based upon antigenic profiles, that the morbillivirus associated with the epizootic in freeroaming lions in the Serengeti National Park in Tanzania was a variant of CDV. 16,26,27,37 More recent studies reporting on the genetic similarity between the lion morbillivi...
I NTROD UCTI 0 N The coronaviral nature of feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) and feline enteric coronavirus (FECV) has been well documented by morphological. physicochemical and antigenic studies 1 -10 • However. biochemical and detailed immunochemical analyses of FIPV and FECV have been difficult due to the inability to prepare sufficient quantities of viral material. Recently. we have been able to propagate FIPV and FECV in continuous cell culture of feline origin8.11-13.The purpose of this report is to describe the purification of fel ine coronavi ruses from infected cell culture and to compare five strains with respect to: 1) plaque characteristics. 2) viral structural polypeptide composition and 3) serologic reactivity of experimentally infected cats against the structural polypeptides of homologous and heterologous strains. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cells and vi rusFetal cat \'kIole fetus (fcwf-4) cells were used to propagate all feline coronavirus strains. Cells \\ere cultured with Eagle's 133 P. J. M. Rottier et al. (eds.), Molecular Biology and Pathogenesis of Coronaviruses
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.