Aims: To compare the culture and PCR methods for detection of Brucella melitensis in blood and lymphoid tissue samples obtained from slaughtered sheep (n = 162) testing positive/negative in serological tests (Rose Bengal test and serum agglutination test).
Methods and Results: Of 162 sheep examined, 45 were positive and 117 negative in serological tests. A PCR assay based on a pair of Br. melitensis‐specific primers was used to detect DNA in blood and lymphoid tissue. Brucella melitensis was isolated from 1·2% (2/162) and 17·2% (28/162) of the blood and lymphoid tissue samples respectively. Positive PCR products with a molecular size of 731 bp were obtained from 27·7% (45/162) of blood and 29·0% (47/162) of lymphoid tissue samples.
Conclusions: The species‐specific PCR assay detected a higher number of Br. melitensis DNA both from serologically positive (P < 0·01 in blood PCR, P < 0·001 in tissue PCR) and serologically negative (P < 0·001 in both blood PCR and tissue PCR) sheep compared with classical bacteriological culture methods.
Significance and Impact of the Study: The results emphasize the importance of using more than one type of diagnostic technique for the detection of animals positive for brucellosis, especially with epidemiological purposes.
This study was carried out to determine the whole cell protein profiles of Salmonella serovars from chicken, turkey and sheep faeces by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). A total of 34 Salmonella strains were included in the study, 14 of them were isolated from chicken, 14 from turkey and six from sheep. SDS-PAGE was carried out using 12% (w/v) separating and 4% (w/v) stacking gels. The results showed more than 30 protein bands ranging in size from 97 kDa (kilodaltons) to below 14.4 kDa as determined by visual assessment of their approximate molecular masses. Protein bands of 78.1, 51.2, 41.5, 37.3, 35.1, 33.9, 30.7, 27.6, 25.4, and 24 kDa were detected in all Salmonella serovars. Salmonella strains used in this study were closely related and could not be differentiated depending on the whole cell protein profiles using SDS-PAGE.
Objective: Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive and round-shaped bacterium. It is often positive for catalase and nitrate reduction. Pathogenic isolates support infections by producing protein toxins and the expression of a cell-surface protein virulence factors. Sepsis-related to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has significant morbidity and high mortality rates (15-30%). The methicillin resistance for S. aureus is coded with the MecA gene, while the methicillin sensitivity is coded with the Nuc gene, and they are chromosomal. Similarly, it is coded with the coagulase gene for S. aureus (Coa).
Materials and Methods:In this study, the 16S rRNA gene identification by Real-Time PCR was investigated in forty S. aureus isolates, which were cultured at different times in terms of MIC and SIR tests. The isolates used in the study were determined at the gene level in terms of their differences in methicillin resistance gene (MecA), methicillin susceptibility gene (Nuc), coagulase gene (Coa) and intraspecies differences were examined.
Results:As a result of the study, Staphylococcus spp. yielded positive results with 16S rRNA gene-specific primers in all isolates. Real-Time PCR analysis of the isolates with SYBRGreen-based PCR analysis was performed with 16S rRNA gene-specific primers, and the samples were confirmed to be Staphylococcus. Analysis at the family level was followed by Coa, Nuc, and MecA gene Real-Time PCR results, and it was found that, in terms of Coa and Nuc genes, 19 isolates were positive and 21 isolates were negative. In terms of MecA gene, 16 isolates were positive according to the positive sigmoidal curves and to the single peak melting values, whereas 24 isolates were found to be negative.
Conclusion:It is thought that this study will benefit the community by contributing to the rapid and effective treatment and diagnosis of infections caused by coagulase-positive/negative Staphylococci.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.