Öz 2018'de yayınlanan ve 2019'da yürürlüğe giren Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği (TBDY) rijit bodrumlu binaların tasarımında iki aşamalı yüklemeye dayanan bir yöntemi zorunlu kılmaktadır. Birinci aşama yüklemesinde rijit bodrum kütlesiz olarak, üstyapı kendi kütlesiyle modellenir. Böylelikle mod birleştirme yöntemiyle deprem analizinde sadece üstyapının kütlesi dikkate alınır. Üstyapının tasarımında kullanılacak deprem kuvvetleri, üstyapının yapısal özelliklerine uygun olarak seçilen deprem yükü azaltma katsayılarıyla bu modelden elde edilir. İkinci aşama yüklemesinde üstyapı kütlesiz olarak, rijit bodrum kendi kütlesiyle modellenir ve böylelikle deprem analizinde sadece rijit bodrumun kütlesi dikkate alınır. Rijit bodrumun tasarımında kullanılacak deprem kuvvetleri, kendisinin yapısal özelliklerine uygun olarak seçilen deprem yükü azaltma katsayılarıyla bu ikinci modelden elde edilir. Ayrıca, bu şekilde belirlenen rijit bodrum deprem kuvvetlerine üstyapıdan aktarılan düşey ve yatay kuvvetler de eklenir. Üstyapı ve rijit bodrumun deprem hesabında farklı analiz modellerinin kullanılması ve bodrum katların tasarımında bu kuvvetlerin birleştirilmesi belli ölçüde zaman alıcı, karmaşık ve hataya müsait bir süreçtir. Bu çalışmada sayısal analiz sonuçlarına dayalı olarak, rijit bodrumlu binaların modelleme ve tasarımına yönelik bazı değerlendirmeler ve öneriler sunulmuştur.
The debate about the post-war reconstruction has been ongoing during the last six years of the ongoing Syrian war. The increasing volume of destruction in different big cities has created a need for new ideas and innovative building solutions. Many studies have tried to suggest solutions comparing other countries ruined by wars such as post-WWII case studies from Germany, Poland, Italy, and also Bosnia after the Balkan War. The case studies have considered similarities and differences demanding innovative ideas and non-traditional solutions for the reconstruction of large Syrian cities such as Aleppo and Homs. With the recent political and military changes in Syria many Syrian refugees have started to return to relatively safe areas within Syria, especially from neighboring countries. New needs have emerged to accommodate and support people who have lost their homes in cities, towns, and villages. This paper is investigating an alternative solution building upon the local Syrian vernacular architecture and construction using existing traditions and methodologies as a possible feasible alternative to rebuild homes in rural areas. This building methodology is suitable for rural society not only for architectural appropriateness, but also for economic and social reasons. Ancient cities such as Aleppo and Homs have been destroyed and rebuilt several times during their long histories. The accumulated gained experience from building local vernacular architecture is being used as a source for future reconstruction efforts by adapting it to modern needs. The aim of this study is to investigate the possibilities of using traditional materials and construction methods in rural Syrian areas to build modular housing units for displaced Syrians. The goal is to provide a feasible transitional alternative to the tents in refugee camps. The proposed modular homes are more stable than tents, are easy to build, and provide a quick option to provide housing with living quality. The advantage of the proposed housing is the reintroduction of an existing building tradition with the same cultural and social values. The homes are intended for the returning inhabitants from the rural areas and urban Syrian refugees staying temporarily until the larger urban centers have some reconstructed infrastructure. The therapeutic effects of the countryside and the social connections established by working together to physically rebuild the homes are aspects considered in this reconstruction proposal.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.