No abstract

No abstract

A proudly niche journal"Social', 'research', 'data' and 'analysis': if we had wanted to choose our own words to describe what the BMS is about, we would probably not have done otherwise. For that is what we aim to publish in this journal, which Karl van Meter entrusted to us five years ago: articles in which our colleagues report on the way they construct and analyse data in order to better question what is at stake in the social world. And to do this, as this word cloud indicates, all methods are good: qualitative, quantitative, mixed, through observation, questionnaires -standardised or not -or by collecting data that are already there, which have become increasingly digitalised. Whatever the methods, all paths lead to a renewed questioning of the world around us, as long as reflexivity lights the way and, one might add, that the road is paved with a minimal form of comparison, primary or secondary.To take stock of our five years of commitment to the BMS, we have gone through the 18 editorials published since 2018. As these short texts underline, our editorial Figure 1. Word cloud based on keywords from BMS articles 2018-2022.

No abstract

Cet article propose d'analyser comment les élites ministérielles issues du monde des affaires, tant public que privé, investissent les fonctions ministérielles au Maroc. Les résultats statistiques d'une analyse quantitative suggèrent trois avantages compétitifs des élites économiques par rapport aux membres du gouvernement : la stabilité dans la fonction, des départements ministériels plus étendus et une occupation des secteurs de politique publique à caractère productif. Ce travail contribue à la littérature sur les coalitions de pouvoir entre les élites politiques et économiques en examinant comment elles se forment dans l'exécutif du système politique marocain avant et après le contexte de 2011. Classification JEL : H16, P16, G18, L26