Background: This study aimed to investigate the effects of an intervention focusing on better opioid prescription practice in a tertiary metropolitan hospital orthopaedic unit. Methods: Following a previous audit of opioid prescribing in the orthopaedics unit, an intervention comprising the (i) Expert Advisory Group oversight of opioid prescribing, (ii) development of a prescription opioid guideline for various hospital contexts and (iii) a series of education sessions was undertaken to improve opioid prescription practice. A reaudit was subsequently carried out to determine whether the intervention had had an impact on the previously audited orthopaedic unit. Results: Each audit period was 6 months. There were 281 orthopaedic patients in the original audit (). In both audits, a high proportion of patients were discharged to the community on opioids, 82.2% (n = 231) pre-intervention and 79.6% (n = 230) post-intervention. Statistically significant differences in opioid prescribing were found between audits, including: a reduction in the number of patients discharged on combination opioids from 71.4% to 45.7% (P < 0.001), a reduction in the provision of full pharmaceutical quantities of opioid on discharge from 29.4% to 6.1% (P < 0.001) and an increase in opioid weaning plans included in discharge summaries from 6.9% to 87.4% (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Raised awareness across the organization and education for staff more than halved the post-operative opioid prescription levels. This highlights the capacity for change in hospitals and the ability to work towards safer prescribing of post-operative opioid therapy.

Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit substance worldwide and the prevalence of users continues to increase. Over the last 2 decades, the world has seen significant changes regarding cannabis for recreational use as well as application in its use as a therapeutic medicine. This is likely to have influenced the decreasing perception of risks associated with the use of cannabis. Cannabis, however, is not benign and, depending on the pattern of its use, can incur a range of harmful effects, which have implications when prescribing medicinal cannabinoids for individuals. Based on research evidence from recreational use of cannabis as well as the emerging data from trials of medicinal cannabis, we propose some clinical domains that will need specific considerations when prescribing medicinal cannabis.

Background and objective: There is evidence that opioid initiation post-surgery is contributing to the problem of chronic misuse and/or abuse of over the counter medications in the community, and that orthopedic patients may be particularly at risk. The aim of the systematic review with meta-analysis was to identify research that examined opioid use at 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively by previously opioid naïve orthopedic surgery patients.Design, databases, and data treatment: A searched review with meta-analysis was undertaken. Eight databases were search. Meta-analyses conducted at all three time points (3 months, 6 months, and 12 months).Results: The search yielded 779 records, and after screening, 13 papers were included in meta-analysis. Results provide strong evidence that post-operative opioid use amongst the opioid naïve is a real effect (7 percent at 3 months, 4 percent at 6 months, and 2 percent at 12 months). A Z-test for overall effect revealed strong evidence that this proportion was nonzero for opioid use at 3, 6, and 12 months (p 0.001 for all time points). A small but significant proportion of opioid naïve patients who are prescribed opioids remain on these medications up to 12 months post-operatively.Conclusions: The nature of the studies included in the meta-analysis were varied, hence subanalyses regarding surgery type, characteristics of the patient group or other potential factors that might influence the progression to longer term opioid use after these surgeries could not be explored. Given this, further research in this area should explore such specific orthopedic subgroups.

No abstract