Cervical spinal adenosine 2A (A ) receptor activation elicits a prolonged increase in phrenic nerve activity, an effect known as phrenic motor facilitation (pMF). The specific cervical spinal cells expressing the relevant A receptors for pMF are unknown. This is an important question since the physiological outcome of A receptor activation is highly cell type specific. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that the relevant A receptors for pMF are expressed in phrenic motor neurons per se versus non-phrenic neurons of the cervical spinal cord. A receptor immunostaining significantly colocalized with NeuN-positive neurons (89 ± 2%). Intrapleural siRNA injections were used to selectively knock down A receptors in cholera toxin B-subunit-labelled phrenic motor neurons. A receptor knock-down was verified by a ∼45% decrease in A receptor immunoreactivity within phrenic motor neurons versus non-targeting siRNAs (siNT; P < 0.05). There was no evidence for knock-down in cervical non-phrenic motor neurons. In rats that were anaesthetized, subjected to neuromuscular blockade and ventilated, pMF induced by cervical (C3-4) intrathecal injections of the A receptor agonist CGS21680 was greatly attenuated in siA (21%) versus siNT treated rats (147%; P < 0.01). There were no significant effects of siA on phrenic burst frequency. Collectively, our results support the hypothesis that phrenic motor neurons express the A receptors relevant to A receptor-induced pMF.

Respiratory motor neuron survival is critical for maintenance of adequate ventilation and airway clearance, preventing dependence to mechanical ventilation and respiratory tract infections. Phrenic motor neurons are highly vulnerable in rodent models of motor neuron disease versus accessory inspiratory motor pools (e.g. intercostals, scalenus). Thus, strategies that promote phrenic motor neuron survival when faced with disease and/or toxic insults are needed to help preserve breathing ability, airway defense and ventilator independence. Adenosine 2A receptors (A2A) are emerging as a potential target to promote neuroprotection, although their activation can have both beneficial and pathogenic effects. Since the role of A2A receptors in the phrenic motor neuron survival/death is not known, we tested the hypothesis that A2A receptor antagonism promotes phrenic motor neuron survival and preserves diaphragm function when faced with toxic, neurodegenerative insults that lead to phrenic motor neuron death. We utilized a novel neurotoxic model of respiratory motor neuron death recently developed in our laboratory: intrapleural injections of cholera toxin B subunit (CtB) conjugated to the ribosomal toxin, saporin (CtB-Saporin). We demonstrate that intrapleural CtB-Saporin causes: 1) profound phrenic motor neuron death (~5% survival); 2) ~7-fold increase in phrenic motor neuron A2A receptor expression prior to cell death; and 3) diaphragm muscle paralysis (inactive in most rats; ~7% residual diaphragm EMG amplitude during room air breathing). The A2A receptor antagonist istradefylline given after CtB-Saporin: 1) reduced phrenic motor neuron death (~20% survival) and 2) preserved diaphragm EMG activity (~46%). Thus, A2A receptors contribute to neurotoxic phrenic motor neuron death, an effect mitigated by A2A receptor antagonism.

Background Cancer cachexia is an insidious process characterized by muscle atrophy with associated motor deficits, including diaphragm weakness and respiratory insufficiency. Although neuropathology contributes to muscle wasting and motor deficits in many clinical disorders, neural involvement in cachexia‐linked respiratory insufficiency has not been explored. Methods We first used whole‐body plethysmography to assess ventilatory responses to hypoxic and hypercapnic chemoreflex activation in mice inoculated with the C26 colon adenocarcinoma cell line. Mice were exposed to a sequence of inspired gas mixtures consisting of (i) air, (ii) hypoxia (11% O 2 ) with normocapnia, (iii) hypercapnia (7% CO 2 ) with normoxia, and (iv) combined hypercapnia with hypoxia (i.e. maximal chemoreflex response). We also tested the respiratory neural network directly by recording inspiratory burst output from ligated phrenic nerves, thereby bypassing influences from changes in diaphragm muscle strength, respiratory mechanics, or compensation through recruitment of accessory motor pools. Results Cachectic mice demonstrated a significant attenuation of the hypoxic tidal volume (0.26mL±0.01mL vs 0.30mL±0.01mL; p<0.05), breathing frequency (317±10bpm vs 344±6bpm; p<0.05) and phrenic nerve (29.5±2.6% vs 78.8±11.8%; p<0.05) responses. On the other hand, the much larger hypercapnic tidal volume (0.46±0.01mL vs 0.46±0.01mL; p>0.05), breathing frequency (392±5bpm vs 408±5bpm; p>0.05) and phrenic nerve (93.1±8.8% vs 111.1±13.2%; p>0.05) responses were not affected. Further, the concurrent hypercapnia/hypoxia tidal volume (0.45±0.01mL vs 0.45±0.01mL; p>0.05), breathing frequency (395±7bpm vs 400±3bpm; p>0.05), and phrenic nerve (106.8±7.1% vs 147.5±38.8%; p>0.05) responses were not different between C26 cachectic and control mice. Conclusions Breathing deficits associated with cancer cachexia are specific to the hypoxic ventilatory response and, thus, reflect disruptions in the hypoxic chemoafferent neural network. Diagnostic techniques that detect decompensation and therapeutic approaches that support the failing hypoxic respiratory response may benefit patients at risk for cancer cachectic‐associated respiratory failure.

No abstract