Respiratory motor neuron survival is critical for maintenance of adequate ventilation and airway clearance, preventing dependence to mechanical ventilation and respiratory tract infections. Phrenic motor neurons are highly vulnerable in rodent models of motor neuron disease versus accessory inspiratory motor pools (e.g. intercostals, scalenus). Thus, strategies that promote phrenic motor neuron survival when faced with disease and/or toxic insults are needed to help preserve breathing ability, airway defense and ventilator independence. Adenosine 2A receptors (A2A) are emerging as a potential target to promote neuroprotection, although their activation can have both beneficial and pathogenic effects. Since the role of A2A receptors in the phrenic motor neuron survival/death is not known, we tested the hypothesis that A2A receptor antagonism promotes phrenic motor neuron survival and preserves diaphragm function when faced with toxic, neurodegenerative insults that lead to phrenic motor neuron death. We utilized a novel neurotoxic model of respiratory motor neuron death recently developed in our laboratory: intrapleural injections of cholera toxin B subunit (CtB) conjugated to the ribosomal toxin, saporin (CtB-Saporin). We demonstrate that intrapleural CtB-Saporin causes: 1) profound phrenic motor neuron death (~5% survival); 2) ~7-fold increase in phrenic motor neuron A2A receptor expression prior to cell death; and 3) diaphragm muscle paralysis (inactive in most rats; ~7% residual diaphragm EMG amplitude during room air breathing). The A2A receptor antagonist istradefylline given after CtB-Saporin: 1) reduced phrenic motor neuron death (~20% survival) and 2) preserved diaphragm EMG activity (~46%). Thus, A2A receptors contribute to neurotoxic phrenic motor neuron death, an effect mitigated by A2A receptor antagonism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.