Background The diagnosis of keratoconus, as the most prevalent corneal ectatic disorder, at the subclinical stage gained great attention due to the increased acceptance of refractive surgeries. This study aimed to assess the pattern of the corneal biomechanical properties derived from Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST) and evaluate the diagnostic value of these parameters in distinguishing subclinical keratoconus (SKC) from normal eyes. Methods This prospective study was conducted on 73 SKC and 69 normal eyes. Subclinical keratoconus eyes were defined as corneas with no clinical evidence of keratoconus and suspicious tomographic and tomographic features. Following a complete ophthalmic examination, topographic and tomographic corneal assessment via Pentacam HR, and corneal biomechanical evaluation utilizing Corvis ST were done. Results Subclinical keratoconus eyes presented significantly higher Deformation Amplitude (DA) ratio, Tomographic Biomechanical Index (TBI), and Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) rates than the control group. Conversely, Ambrósio Relational Thickness to the Horizontal profile (ARTh), and Stiffness Parameter at the first Applanation (SPA1) showed significantly lower rates in SKC eyes. In diagnosing SKC from normal eyes, TBI (AUC: 0.858, Cut-off value: > 0.33, Youden index: 0.55), ARTh (AUC: 0.813, Cut-off value: ≤ 488.1, Youden index: 0.58), and CBI (AUC: 0.804, Cut-off value: > 0.47, Youden index: 0.49) appeared as good indicators. Conclusions Integrated Corvis ST parameters could be valuable in distinguishing SKC eyes from normal ones.
The outbreak of COVID-19 associated rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis (CA-ROCM) through the latest waves of the pandemic in several countries gathered attention to this rare fungal infection. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the demographic and medical profile, clinical signs and symptoms (with a special focus on ophthalmic findings), imaging features, and the outcome of CA-ROCM patients. The collaborative study of COVID-19 Associated Rhino-Orbital-Cerebral Mucormycosis in Iran (CA-ROCM-IR) has been conducted in 8 tertiary referral ophthalmology centers among different provinces of Iran during the fifth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. All patients were subjected to complete history taking and comprehensive ophthalmological examination, and underwent standard accepted treatment strategy based on the disease stage. The present report is the preliminary results of this project study. Two hundred seventy-four CA-ROCM patients, including 150 males (54.7%), who had a mean age of 56.8 ± 12.44 years, were enrolled. Diabetes mellitus was the most prevalent (82.8%) medical disease among the patients. Supplemental oxygen administration and corticosteroid use due to COVID-19 were present in a large proportion of the patients (68.2%, and 73.7% respectively). The most common primary complaints were facial pain (47.4%), facial swelling (38.3%), and nasal discharge (32.5%). Ptosis (58%), periorbital swelling (46%), and nasal congestion (40.5%) were common signs and symptoms among CA-ROCM patients. A majority of the patients (80.3%) were diagnosed at stage 3 or higher of ROCM and the rate of ocular involvement in whom was 92.3%. The most affected paranasal sinus was the ethmoid sinus (75.2%), followed by the maxillary sinus (70.8%). A total of 30 patients (10.9%) had expired before discharge from hospitals. Patients with a history of cigarette smoking (OR = 7.25), ICU admission (OR = 87.36), higher stage of the ROCM (OR = 4.22), receiving endoscopic debridement and transcutaneous retrobulbar amphotericin B (TRAMB) (OR = 4.20), and bilateral ocular involvement (OR = 2.94) had upper odds for death before discharge from hospital. History of taking systemic corticosteroids during COVID-19 was significantly associated with reduced odds of mortality (OR = 0.058, P = 0.006). Also, GEE analysis showed statistically significant higher mean LogMAR visual acuity score among expired patients (3.71, 95% CI: 3.04–4.38) compared to patients who were discharged from hospitals (2.42, 95% CI: 2.16–2.68) (P < 0.001).
This review is proposed to summarize the updates on COVID-19 and ophthalmology along with the bibliometric features of articles that have been published since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak. The databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched using “Coronavirus,” “COVID-19,” “SARS-CoV-2,” “pandemic,” “ophthalmology,” “ophthalmic,” and “eye” keywords. All published articles except commentaries, errata, and corrigenda up to April 2021 were included. Titles and abstracts were screened, and ophthalmology-focused articles were collected. The bibliographic information of the articles, such as the name and country of the first author, type of study, date of publication, language, and journal name, were extracted. Included studies were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist. After systematic searching, 2,669 distinct articles were screened by title/abstract, and 1,174 ophthalmology-focused articles were selected to be reviewed. Ophthalmology-focused publications accounted for less than 0.5 percent of the total COVID-19-related articles. Most of the articles were published in the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, and the main publication type was “original article.” Almost 88% of the publications were in English. There was a decline in the publication rate during the initial months of 2021 compared with the middle and last months of 2020. Most of the publications were affiliated with the United States of America. However, Singapore and the United Kingdom were the countries with the highest number of publications after population adjustment. Furthermore, a comprehensive review on major topics including SARS-CoV-2 ocular tropism, ophthalmic manifestations, ocular complications due to COVID-19 treatment strategies, the pandemic effect on ophthalmology care and operations, myopia progression during the pandemic, and telemedicine was conducted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.