Latar belakang. Gangguan tidur dinilai dari gangguan dalam jumlah, kualitas, atau waktu tidur. Gangguan tidur banyak ditemukan pada remaja (73,4%), namun belum banyak dilakukan di Indonesia.Tujuan. Mengetahui prevalensi gangguan tidur pada remaja usia 12-15 tahun di SLTP “X”, Kelurahan Jati, Jakarta Timur.Metode. Studi potong lintang dilakukan terhadap 140 pelajar SLTPN 92 di Kelurahan Jati, Jakarta Timur pada bulan Mei 2009, dengan teknik stratified purposive sampling. Pengambilan data dilakukan menggunakan kuesioner Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) yang diisi secara self-administered oleh orang tua beserta anak di rumah.Hasil. Prevalensi gangguan tidur didapatkan 62,9%, dengan gangguan transisi bangun-tidur sebagai jenis gangguan yang paling sering ditemui. Separuh subjek memiliki perbedaan waktu bangun antara hari sekolah dengan hari libur, 72,9% memiliki perbedaan waktu tidur yang tidak signifikan. Separuh subjek tidur cukup selama hari sekolah, dan 65% di hari libur. Aktivitas yang menenangkan sebelum tidur dilakukan oleh 73,6% subjek. Uji kemaknaan menunjukkan hubungan antara gangguan tidur dengan durasi tidur di hari sekolah dan aktivitas di tempat tidur (p<0,05). Tidak ada hubungan antara perbedaan waktu bangun atau tidur hari sekolah dengan hari libur, durasi tidur di hari libur, kebiasaan konsumsi minuman berkafein, dan lingkungan dengan gangguan tidur (p<0,05).Kesimpulan. Gangguan tidur banyak ditemukan pada remaja usia 12-15 tahun. Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children dapat digunakan sebagai uji tapis dalam mendeteksi gangguan tidur pada remaja

A 14-years-old boy came with chief complaint of epiphora and history of globe rupture repair surgery due to facial trauma one year ago. Patient got complications from the trauma, including nasolacrimal duct obstruction, phthisis bulbi, enophthalmos, facial deformities, and ptosis. Multidisciplinary approach was performed simultaneously in one session surgery which included oral mucosal graft for non-irritative phthisis bulbi, silicone block implant for blowout fracture, external dacrycystorhinostomy for obstructed nasolacrimal duct, fascia lata brow suspension/frontalis sling for ptosis, and septorhinoplasty for nasal augmentation. After the surgery, symptoms of epiphora had resolved and aesthetical improvement of facial deformities was also prominent. Management of old orbital fracture poses additional challenges due to the complications that have occurred over time. Loss of functionality may seem impractical to manage because no function can be pertained. Nevertheless, it is important to still perform surgical repair for aesthetic purposes due to the psychological effect on their daily lives.

Introduction: Ophthalmic trauma is defined as injuries affecting the ocular structures, including the globe, eyelid, lacrimal system, and surrounding orbital walls. Blunt trauma acts as the leading cause of injury and it may affect both the anterior and posterior parts of the globe. Prompt diagnosis, early management, and sustained follow-up are mandatory for an optimal outcome. Purpose: This report presents a one-step surgery management process for an intricate case of blunt facial trauma with complex ophthalmic and nasal injury. Patients and Methods: A 45-year-old male with blunt force trauma of the left eye from a wooden block, suffered from naso-orbital-ethmoidal fractures, eyelid laceration with canalicular, close-globe injuries of traumatic cataract and vitreous hemorrhage with retinal detachment. A simultaneous one-step surgery was performed by a trauma team of ophthalmological and ENT surgeons during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic to lessen the risk of cross-transmission. After ruling out the possibility of open-globe rupture, traumatic cataract extraction, retinal detachment surgery, the repair of an eyelid laceration with canalicular involvement, and septorhinoplasty were performed on concomitantly. Results: Anatomical success was achieved for the repair of the nasoorbitoethmoidal (NOE) type II fracture and close-globe injuries, including the anatomical reattachment of the retina. However, the functional outcome remained unsatisfactory. Visual acuity failed to show further improvement at a later follow-up. Traumatic optic neuropathy was, at the final follow-up, considered to be the cause of the suboptimal visual acuity. Conclusion:A single-step multi-procedure for a complex ophthalmic blunt trauma, as demonstrated in this case, may be beneficial for reducing the complications that might arise due to treatment delay. The complex nature of the injury, however, creates the higher possibility for residual post-operative complications. Risks of residual functional impairment should be considered in such complex trauma prior to surgery, to determine the surgical prognostic value and provide appropriate consent to the patient.