Background: Influenza (flu) and COVID-19 vaccination rates are subpar across the US, especially in racial and/or socioeconomic minority groups who are understudied in public health literature. Objective: The objective of this study was to elucidate the attitudes of Turtle Creek patients towards flu and COVID-19 vaccines, with the goal of establishing targetable vaccine education gaps and ultimately increasing vaccine uptake in the community. Design/Patients: This study was conducted as a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Authors completed 123 patient phone surveys of patients cared for at the Turtle Creek Primary Care Center inquiring about flu and COVID-19 infection status and vaccination uptake (August 26 - October 10, 2021). Approach/Key Results: Our data revealed a significant association between COVID-19 and flu vaccine acceptance. Additionally, we found a strong association between vaccine acceptance and age, with older patients being more likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we assessed how flu and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was affected by informational sources participants trusted most. In the COVID-19 models, those who cited trusting medical professionals had higher odds of vaccine acceptance while participants who cited trusting social media had significantly decreased odds of vaccine acceptance. Conclusion: Our study revealed significant trends for flu and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance by sociodemographic factors and trust in the medical system. Using these data, we can create future interventions to overcome vaccine hesitancy.
Background: Game-based learning is an engaging and effective educational strategy in medical education. The Internal Medicine resident board review at our institution was considered dull and poorly attended by trainees. We hypothesized that a gamified, longitudinal, team-based approach to board review would rejuvenate board review and improve learner perception of quality and attendance.Methods: We sought to improve the resident perception of and participation in board review through an innovative longitudinal, team-based, game-based intervention, the "Cohort Cup". The "Cohort Cup" was developed and implemented over a 22-week intervention period from November 2017 to May 2018. Teams (cohorts) competed in real-time against one another. Evaluation methods include a pre/post attitudes survey on a 5-point Likert scale (1 -strongly disagree, 5 -strongly agree) and attendance data.Findings: Of 105 residents eligible to participate, 82 completed the pre-intervention survey, and 74 completed the post-intervention survey. We observed statistically significant increases in self-perceptions of engagement, the perceived value of the sessions, and preferences for game-based learning. Selfperceptions of learner engagement improved from 2.74 to 3.8. The value of the educational experience increased from 2.68 to 3.95. Preferences for game-based learning improved from 3.77 to 4.32. Board review attendance doubled. Residents commented the intervention improved class bonding. Board passage rate increased from 86% to 97%. Conclusions: Our game-based intervention successfully rejuvenated our board review. We observed more joy in the learning environment and improvements in resident engagement, and in their attitudes regarding board review. Game-based learning can be a valuable educational tool and can be a positive facet of educational communities.
Background: Influenza (flu) and COVID-19 vaccination rates are subpar across the US, especially in racial and/or socioeconomic minority groups who are understudied in public health literature. The objective of this study was to elucidate the attitudes of Turtle Creek patients towards flu and COVID-19 vaccines, with the goal of establishing targetable vaccine education gaps and ultimately increasing vaccine uptake in the community.Methods: This study was conducted as a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Authors completed 123 patient phone surveys of patients cared for at the Turtle Creek Primary Care Center inquiring about flu and COVID-19 infection status and vaccination uptake (August 26 - October 10, 2021).Results: Our data revealed a significant association between COVID-19 and flu vaccine acceptance. Additionally, we found a strong association between vaccine acceptance and age, with older patients being more likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we assessed how flu and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was affected by informational sources participants trusted most. In the COVID-19 models, those who cited “trusting medical professionals” had higher odds of vaccine acceptance while participants who cited “trusting social media” had significantly decreased odds of vaccine acceptance.Conclusion: Our study revealed significant trends for flu and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance by sociodemographic factors and trust in the medical system. Using these data, we can create future interventions to overcome vaccine hesitancy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.