No abstract

Aim To evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcome of ovarian Sertoli–Leydig cell tumors (SLCTs) managed at a single institution. Methods The hospital records of 17 patients with the diagnosis of ovarian SLCT between 1994 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Results The median age of the patients was 30 years (range, 18–67 years). All the patients had unilateral tumors. All of the 17 were stage 1 tumors. Two (11.8%) patients were stage 1C1 and two (11.8%) patients were stage 1C2. Thirteen (76.5%) patients were stage 1A. Three (17.6%) of the tumors were well differentiated, 11 (64.7%) were intermediately differentiated, 1 (5.9%) was poorly differentiated, and the degree of the differentiation was not identified for 2 (11.8%) patients. One showed retiform pattern and one had heterologous elements at the histopathologic evaluation. Among the 17 patients, we identified structural/vascular renal and ureteral anomalies in 3 (17.6%) patients. Eight patients underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy, seven underwent unilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy or oophorectomy and two underwent cystectomy with or without additional surgical staging procedures. Four patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. All the 17 patients were alive and free of disease for 1–287 months after the diagnosis. Median follow‐up time was 78 months. None of the patients recurred. Conclusion Sertoli–Leydig cell tumors are rare ovarian malignancies with low recurrence rates and have a favorable outcome compared to malignant epithelial tumors of the ovary. Main treatment is surgical resection and it is appropriate to prefer fertility sparing conservative surgeries for young patients.

In the present study with a long follow-up period and in which most of the patients had staging surgery including lymphadenectomy (76.6%), lymph node recurrence was not observed and the total recurrence rate (12.5%) was lower than that reported in the literature. The study showed the importance of surgical staging in patients with AGCT.

Objective To report the perioperative outcomes of 200 patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent surgery during the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID‐19) pandemic and the safety of surgical approach. Methods Data of patients operated between March 10 and May 20, 2020, were collected retrospectively. Data were statistically analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics for Windows v. SP21.0. Results Data of 200 patients were included. Their mean age was 56 years. Of the patients, 54% (n=108), 27.5% (n=55), 12.5% (n=25), and 2% (n=4) were diagnosed as having endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar cancer, respectively. Of them, 98% underwent non‐emergent surgery. A minimally invasive surgical approach was used in 18%. Stage 1 cancer was found in 68% of patients. Surgeons reported COVID‐related changes in 10% of the cases. The rate of postoperative complications was 12%. Only two patients had cough and suspected pneumonic lesions on thoracic computed tomography postoperatively, but neither was positive for COVID‐19 on polymerase chain reaction testing. Conclusion Based on the present findings, it is thought that gynecologic cancer surgery should continue during the COVID‐19 pandemic while adhering to the measures. Postponement or non‐surgical management should only be considered in patients with documented infection. Gynecologic cancer surgery should continue during the COVID‐19 pandemic while adhering to measures. Only 1% of patients developed COVID‐19‐related symptoms during the postoperative follow‐up period.

Fertility-conserving approach is safe in early stage MOGCTs. However, maximal cytoreduction should be achieved in this group of patients, without conceding fertility-conserving approach. On the other hand, development of chemotherapy options with less gonadotoxic effects, but equal or stronger efficiency in comparison with platinum-based chemotherapy, will certainly facilitate management of this patient group.