This research aims to uncover the identity of the ideology and practices of the religious Sorority PTKI Se-Metro City about hijab. This important research is done because of the assumption that the use of certain types of hijab is the symbol of extremism and radicalism. First, the existence of the facts users Hijab and veil that are involved in terrorism. In this study, the researchers used a qualitative research method. Data networking is done by the method of conversing and listening. Researchers conduct interviews and record the results of the interviews in the form of sound or video. As for the theory used in exposing the identity of the ideology and practice of religious students about the veil is a religious dimension to the Glock and Stark. As for the findings from this research are (1) the use of the veil distributed by the ideology of syncretism that fall into the category of space in between. But the identity of the space in between is so potentially could be changed, both moved on to understand the extreme about hijab and veil or more moderate in understanding that the veil is not a compulsory subject. (2 user veil that has extreme religious ideology of familiar and has been crystallized. Students who have learned not to mention could have contested the pattern she thought. But in their religious practice has three types of practices, syncretism, moderate and extreme in understanding hijab.

The aim of this study is to know the level of readability of students’ result translation and the error using translation procedure. The researcher used qualitative research. The subject of this research was 15 students at the fifth semester. The result show that the percentages of students’ idiomatic translation result in readability aspect were; 14% data of the translation result was readable, 59% data of the translation result was almost readable, and 27% data of the translation result was unreadable. The percentage of students done mistake in procedures of translation were: 70% students’ errors in using addition, 60% students’ error in using omission, and 40% student’s error in using transposition. Mostly and relatively they translated the text literally, using unacceptable term, translated out of the context

Abstract