Handling election violations abroad is one of the determinants of the quality of elections in Indonesia, with the rise of cases that occurred abroad during the 2019 general election, it is hoped that this will be a lesson to make an ideal design for handling election violations abroad in 2024. This research is executed differently from existing or previous research, Example “The novelty of this research will make a significant contribution to determining the means, size, and function of the parliamentary threshold in the legislative election”. The conclusions of the research show that first, the urgency of handling election violations abroad to create order and peace, protect constitutional rights and uphold justice. Second, to realize the ideal design in handling election violations abroad in 2024, it is carried out increasing the number of members of the Overseas General Elections Supervisory committee from 3 to 5 people, making changes to Article 112 letter c, Article 507 of the Election Law, Article 13 paragraph (4) of the Regulation of General Elections Supervisory Agency Number 7 of 2018 and Article 60 paragraph (1) of the Regulation of General Elections Supervisory Agency Number 8 of 2018, and changing the paradigm of law enforcement from compliance level to internalization of legal compliance in the 2024 elections.

The retributive justice paradigm, which forms the legal basis for eradicating corruption, is irrelevant to the law’s main objective against corruption in Indonesia. The spirit to save state assets must be based on restorative justice thinking oriented towards recovering from criminal acts rather than imprisoning corruptors. This study aims to examine the legal and political policies for eradicating corruption in Indonesia, where restorative justice can be used to restore state financial losses that can be recovered by the accused. This study uses normative legal research to answer the problems faced, and the authors use legal rules, legal principles, principles, and doctrines. The study results show that 1) the concept of restorative justice in sentencing perpetrators of corruption can be implemented by strengthening the norms of restitution for state losses from serving as additional crimes to becoming principal crimes. As for anticipating perpetrators unable to pay for these losses, the concept of forced labor can be applied instead of imprisoning perpetrators of corruption; 2) the concept of restorative justice in sentencing perpetrators of corruption can be implemented in the form of strengthening the norms of returning state losses from being an additional crime to being a major crime; 3) it is important to reform the criminal act of corruption immediately so that the restorative justice paradigm can be immediately introduced into the new legal norms.

Legal provisions that live in society are one of the controversial provisions in the ratification of the Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP). That is because the law in the community is related to legal values written and unwritten in society. This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of culture in RKUHP. This research is normative legal research that puts forward legal issues on the implications of legal arrangements regarding living law in the RKUHP and focuses on using a conceptual and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that the construction of living law in the community (living law) in the RKUHP, which emphasizes that the living law is customary law, is also formulated simultaneously with the regional role in establishing regional regulations based on the substance of local customary law. In addition, the construction of regional rules to accommodate Article 2 of the RKUHP to regulate the importance of customary law raises legal ambiguity, namely regional rules at the provincial or regency/city level that have the authority to regulate them; so that there is no disharmony of customary law arrangements in the formulation of regional regulations as a follow-up to Article 2 RKUHP. Furthermore, the legal implications related to living law arrangements in the RKUHP, namely the lack of clarity in Article 2 of the RKUHP, including the need for regulation at the regional level through regional regulations, have the potential to cause criminalization based on regional principles

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 menjadi penegasan konstitusional Mahkamah melepaskan kewenangan untuk menyelesaikan perselisihan hasil pemilihan Kepala Daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah. Mengingat secara konseptual pemilihan kepala daerah dan wakil kepala daerah tidak termasuk dalam rezim pemilihan umum. Pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi lahirlah Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 sebagaimana diubah beberapa kali terakhir dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2020 yang secara tegas mengatur dan mengamanatkan dibentuknya badan peradilan khusus yang menangani perselisihan hasil pemilihan. Baik putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi maupun Undang -Undang tidak menjelaskan secara detail mengenai desain Peradilan khusus yang menangani perselisihan hasil pemilihan. Oleh sebab itu, tulisan ini hendak menjawab pertanyaan penelitian tentang: pertama, Jika MK telah meletakkan wewenang penyelesaian sengketa hasil pemilihan, bagaimana arah pemikiran MK dalam mendesain penyelesaian sengketa hasil pemilihan berdasarkan putusan Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013?. Kedua, Putusan MK telah diejawantahkan ke dalam UU Pemilihan, selaraskah pemikiran MK dalam putusan Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 dengan penormaan dalam UU Pemilihan terkait perselisihan hasil? ketiga, bagaimanakah desain badan peradilan khusus yang sejalan dengan putusan Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 dan UU Pemilihan? Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus, dengan sumber bahan hukum kepustakaan dan teknik analisis preskriptif. Adapun temuan dari penelitian ini ialah; pertama ratio decidendi putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 nampak secara implisit meletakkan wewenang penyelesaian sengketa hasil pilkada menjadi bagian dari wewenang lembaga Mahkamah Agung. Kedua, Penormaan UU Pilkada terkait dengan penyelesaian perselisihan hasil pemilihan selaras dengan putusan MK. Ketiga, desain badan peradilan khusus pemilihan dibentuk di bawah Mahkamah Agung.

Proof in the concept of procedural law is a very important condition, evidence to clarify a case a quo. However, the existence of a portrait of law-making which always limps along with the times, forces the law to be able to find its existence in the legal state of society. This also includes the state of society 4.0, which is of course proven that a case that is regulated is still conventional. digital evidence must have a certain position. This paper raises a view of the evidentiary system in procedural law, especially including in the perspective of the electoral procedural law system. Through the legal approach, case approach, library approach and comparison approach. This paper focuses on the issue of optimizing digital, especially in the view of the Criminal Procedure Law System.