No abstract

Natural gas, the cleanest fossil fuel, is an abundant source of methane and expected to play an increasingly important role in powering the world’s economic growth over the energy transition of the coming decades. Methane has the potential to be a CO2-free feedstock to cogenerate hydrogen (H2) and added value “building-blocks” chemicals (e.g., olefins and aromatics) for petrochemistry. In this review, the two processes (i) the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) for production of ethylene and (ii) the nonoxidative methane dehydroaromatization (MDA) producing hydrogen and benzene are discussed. Both routes convert methane directly into valuable products, an advantage over the several-steps syngas route. The performances of various a variety of catalysts reported during the last 25 years for OCM (MnNaW, La2O3, Li-MgO, etc.) and MDA (M/HZSM-5, M/TNU-9, M/IM-5, M/ITQ-2, M@SiO2, M@CeO2, TaH/SiO2, GaN/SBA15, single-site M@HZSM-5, bimetallic M-M′/HZSM-5, core–shell structures, M/Zr­(SO4)2 with M = Mo, Fe, Pt) under similar reaction conditions are compared. The major drawbacks and the strategies used to mitigate the main challenges related with the performance of the catalysts in both OCM and MDA reactions are critically revealed. For instance, the overoxidation in the OCM is mitigated by optimizing of the operating conditions, using alternative oxidants, and the application of membrane reactor technology are discussed. In the MDA reaction, the major issue is the catalyst deactivation by coke formation and migration and sintering of metallic active phases. Strategies for robust catalysts, methods for mild coke removal, pretreatment under reductive atmosphere are presented. Approaches to improve aromatics yields over coke production by addition of promoters or co-feed reactants to the MDA catalysts are also discussed.

No abstract

Ethylene dehydroaromatisation (EDA) was investigated at 700 °C under 1 bar of ethylene (5 mol% in N2) over a micro-(M) and a nano-sized (N) H-ZSM-5. On the M zeolite an induction period followed by deactivation was observed, which could be related to the presence of long diffusion path lengths in this sample, leading to mass transfer resistance. During the induction step, the aromatics yield increases, despite a significant loss of the acid site concentration as a result of coking. This induction period corresponds to the formation of an active hydrocarbon pool (HCP) composed of units of 2 to 5 aromatic rings with a molecular weight ranging from 130 to 220 g mol−1 (light coke). A kinetic study revealed that the developing HCP species is two times more active than Brønsted acid sites in the fresh zeolite. Diffusion limitations yet impact the product desorption by promoting coke growth and, therefore the deactivation of the HCP and hence of the catalyst. From MA-LDI/LDI-TOF MS (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization—Time of Flight Mass Spectroscopy) characterisation was deduced that even after complete catalyst deactivation, the as-deposited coke continues growing at the external surface of the zeolite by condensation reactions, thus leading to heavy coke composed of more than 100 carbon atoms and a molar mass exceeding 1300 g mol−1. Unlike the micro-sized zeolite, the nano-scaled zeolite features a short diffusion path length and promotes fast formation of the active HCP. As a result, higher activity and selectivity into benzene were observed, whilst catalyst deactivation was significantly mitigated.

In this article, we describe the synthesis of γ‐lactones through the reaction of sulfoxonium ylides, aldehydes, and disubstituted ketenes. The one‐pot sequential method provides access to γ‐lactones from disubstituted ketenes, in moderate to excellent yields, and with good diastereoselectivity favoring the trans‐diastereomer (dr up to 92 : 8). The reaction mechanism was investigated by performing labeling, crossover, and various control experiments. The results of those experiments support the reaction mechanism involving betaine formation, reaction of the betaine with a ketene to form an enolate intermediate, [3,3]‐sigmatropic rearrangement of an enolate intermediate, and finally, 5‐exo‐tet cyclization to afford the γ‐lactone product.