To assess whether coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination is associated with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation or early pregnancy outcomes. METHODS:This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation or single euploid frozen-thawed embryo transfer at a single academic center. Patients fully vaccinated with a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine were compared with unvaccinated patients who cycled during the same time period. The primary outcome was the fertilization rate for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and the clinical pregnancy rate for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Secondary outcomes for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation included eggs retrieved, mature oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes ratio, blastulation rate, and euploid rate. Secondary outcomes for frozen-thawed embryo transfer included preg-nancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, biochemical pregnancy loss rate, and clinical pregnancy loss rate.See related editorial on page 479.
BACKGROUND: It is hypothesized that pregnancy causes time-limited physiologic adaptations of the reproductive system, such as increased blood flow to the uterus. With long interpregnancy intervals, those adaptations may regress, and maternal physiologic characteristics may revert to those of primigravid women. Therefore, it is plausible that long interpregnancy interval is associated with cesarean delivery, especially due to arrest disorders (failed induction of labor, arrest of dilation, or arrest of descent). OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between interpregnancy interval and cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders in multiparous women without a history of cesarean delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all women who had more than 1 singleton pregnancy at 23 weeks' gestation or greater at MedStar Washington Hospital Center from January 2009 to June 2018. We defined the interpregnancy interval as the duration from the birth of the preceding offspring to the date of conception of the index offspring. We a priori decided to categorize women based on the interpregnancy interval (less than 18 months, 18À59 months, and 60 months or greater). Our primary outcome was cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders. We also examined overall cesarean delivery and cesarean delivery due to nonreassuring fetal heart tracing. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, controlling for predefined covariates. RESULTS: Of 2741 women, 1143 (41.7%), 1369 (49.9%), and 229 (8.4%) had an interpregnancy interval of less than 18 months, 18À59 months, and 60 months or more, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, an interpregnancy interval of 60 months or more compared to an interpregnancy interval of 18À59 months was associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders (4.8% vs 1.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.34À6.97) and cesarean delivery due to arrest of dilation (3.1% vs 0.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.10À9.59). An interpregnancy interval of less than 18 months compared to an interpregnancy interval of 18À59 months was associated with decreased odds of cesarean delivery due to nonreassuring fetal heart tracing (2.4% vs 4.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.32À0.92). CONCLUSION: An interpregnancy interval of 60 months or greater compared to an interpregnancy interval of 18À59 months was associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery due to arrest disorders. Beneficial effects on postpartum adaptations in the reproductive system may regress as interpregnancy interval increases.
Myomectomy is associated with a short-term decline in serum anti-müllerian hormone levels; however, no long-term change in ovarian reserve, as measured by anti-müllerian hormone levels, is observed, regardless of route of surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.