No abstract

Objectives This is an open-label randomized control trial with a parallel assignment with single masking comparing patients undergoing coronary angiography via dorsal radial and classical radial access. Methods Study done at three tertiary cardiac care centers for two years. A total of 970 patients were finally recruited for the study. Patients were randomly selected for dorsal radial artery access Group A (485 patients) and classical radial artery access Group B (485 patients) without any bias for age & sex. Results On comparative assessment both techniques are found to be equal in terms of procedural success rate. While dorsal access was superior in terms of fewer incidences of forearm radial artery occlusion, radial artery spasm, less post-procedure persistence of pain, and hand clumsiness. In comparison to this, the number of puncture attempts and time to achieve post-procedure hemostasis is less in classical radial access. Conclusion So both techniques have pros and coins and it is the discretion of interventionists to adopt which technique.

No abstract

BackgroundAmong patients undergoing intervention involving venous access, various techniques have been implemented to achieve hemostasis in order to reduce local access site complications, to decrease length of stay and to facilitate early ambulation. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of fellow’s stitch using “fisherman’s knot” (figure of Z (FoZ)) technique when compared with conventional manual compression for immediate closure of large venous sheath (> 10 French (Fr)).MethodsBetween November 2012 and March 2019, 949 patients underwent various interventions which involved venous access requiring hemostasis. All the patients were anticoagulated with heparin during the procedure. In a sequential allocation, fellow’s stitch using “fisherman’s knot” (group I: n = 384) and conventional manual compression (group II: n = 365) were used in achieving hemostasis at right/left femoral venous access site following sheath removal (> 12 Fr). A 0-Vicryl suture was used to make one deep stitch just distal to entry of sheath and one superficial stitch just proximal to entry site, thereby creating an FoZ. A fisherman’s knot was then tied, and knot was pushed down while sheath was removed. In cases where immediate hemostasis was not achieved, it was compressed for 2 min to achieve it.ResultsThe mean age of 949 patients was 13.1 ± 8.2 years where male (n = 574; 65%) outnumbered female (n = 375; 35%). In group I, hemostasis was achieved immediately after tying the knot in 343 (89.3%) patients, while within ≤ 2 min of light pressure in 41 (10.7%) patients. Five (1.3%) patients had failure of stitch as suture snapped during knotting, and hemostasis was achieved by manual compression as per protocol in group I. The median time to hemostasis (1.1 vs. 14.3 min, P < 0.001), ambulation (3.3 vs. 18.9 h, P < 0.01) and hospital stay (24.6 vs. 36.8 h, P < 0.001) was significantly shorter in group I compared to group II. The minor vascular access site complications in form of hematoma (n = 6 (1.6%) vs. n = 1 (0.2%); P < 0.001), and thrombosis at femoral vein (n = 4 (1.1%) vs. n = 0 (0%); P < 0.001) were significantly higher in group II when compared to group I. The differences regarding re-bleeding and formation of arterio-venous fistula between both the groups were statistically insignificant.ConclusionThe fellow’s stitch using “fisherman’s knot” or “FoZ” suture is a simple, efficacious and safe technique to achieve an immediate hemostasis after removal of larger venous sheath (> 10 Fr).

BackgroundLesion characteristics (anatomy, calcification, tortuosity and angulation), vessel morphology, and lack of support add complexity of coronary intervention. Guidezilla catheter, acting as an extension of guide catheter system (mother-in-child catheter), helps to overcome these complexities by enhancing backup during complex intervention.MethodsThe present retrospective, single-center study included 13,157 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through both transfemoral and transradial routes from January 2015 to July 2019 at LPS Institute of Cardiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India among which Guidezilla™ catheter (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) was used in 156 patients. Study endpoints were target lesion crossing, procedural success, and complications. The clinical, angiographic and procedural data of all 156 patients were evaluated to assess safety and efficacy of Guidezilla extension catheter (GEC).ResultsThe mean age of the enrolled patients was 61.2 ± 8.67 years. Type-C lesion was commonest (69.9%) followed by B2 (22.4%) and B1 (7.7%). The commonest indication for its use was tortuosity (30.1%) followed by calcification (21.1%), angulation (18.8%), chronic total occlusion (17.9%), distally located lesion (8.3%), and anomalous origin of vessel in 3.8%. The right coronary artery (39.2%) was most commonly intervened artery followed by left anterior descending (LAD) (30.8%), left circumflex (LCX) (19.9%), multivessels (7.6%), and saphenous vein graft in 2.5%. The mean depth of intubation was 4.2 ± 1.9 cm. Mean diameter of stents was 34.2 ± 14.4 mm while mean length of stents was 31.2 ± 10.2 mm. Lesions were modified using aggressive pre-dilatation in 87.8%, followed by cutting balloon in 10.9%. GEC was delivered across the lesion using buddy wire technique (9.6%), balloon-assisted tracking (BAT) in 30.1%, and balloon-assisted sliding and tracking (BLAST) in 4.5% of patients. Stent implantation was successful in 151 out of 156 patients with success rate of 96.7%. Overall failure rate was 3.3% which was contributed by extreme tortuosity, angulation, and severe calcification. Guidezilla-associated procedural complication (dissection, stent dislodgement, shaft breakage) were reported in three patients (1.9%) who were successfully managed.Conclusions Guidezilla system acting as mother-in-child extension catheter is a safe and effective tool which provides additional backup support and increases success rate of PCI for complex coronary lesions.