His study aims to describe the form of transfer and code mixing in public transport (elf) Sindang-Terminal Harjamukti Cirebon Department. The qualitative descriptive approach used in this study is the elaboration of data in the analysis. The results obtained from this study are a form of code switching and code mixing in public transportation (elf) Sindang-Terminal Harjamukti Cirebon Department and its causes. The form of code switching includes internal code switching which includes code switching between languages and code switching between languages and external code switching. The cause of the occurrence of code switching is that the interlocutor has a different language background than the speaker, the speaker has a desire to respect his interlocutor who is older than him, and the limited use of the code. The form of code mixing includes code mixing in the repetition of words and kalusa, mixing code out at the level of phrases and idioms, and mixing mixed codes of baster forms. The reason for code interfering occurs when speakers want to be able to use more popular terms, speakers have a specific purpose and purpose in the conversation, to be just prestigious, and to adjust language use to the topic of conversation.

Salah satu faktor penyebab timbulnya suatu perubahan bunyi dalam bahasa Indonesia adalah faktor lingkungan. Misalnya kata /Sabtu/ dalam bahasa Indonesia lazim diucapkan /Saptu/. Hal ini terlihat bunyi [b] berubah menjadi bunyi [p] sebagai akibat dari pengaruh bunyi [t]. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan perubahan bunyi pada tuturan yang digunakan mahasiswa IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Hasil pengamatan menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon kurang cermat dalam menggunakan melafalkan kata. Mahasiswa masih mencampuradukkan antara bahasa untuk situasi resmi dengan bahasa untuk situasi tidak resmi.

This study aims to identify the underlying barriers that may prevent public policy coordination among stakeholders in dealing with food security in Central Java Province and suggest recommendations to enhance the coordination. This study used primary data from a questionnaire that the six government agencies’ experts filled out. These experts were asked to identify the relevance and the importance of each barrier and formulate a suitable policy recommendation. There were three data processing techniques used in this study: Content Validity Analysis, Interpretative Structural Modelling (ISM) Method, and Delphi Method. The result of the Content Validity Analysis indicated 22 valid barriers. The result of the ISM method indicated eight barriers occupied the topmost level (complicated problems, insufficient sharing of information, ambiguities and lack of clarity, gap of coordination implementations between the rules and policies with the actual practice, fewer budget allocations, different aims and priorities, lack of motivation to collaborate among stakeholders from various disciplines, and weak of infrastructure). The result of the ISM method also indicated three “very significant” barriers: inadequate human resources, the limited capability of the regional government, and lack of communication and high specialization in multisector collaboration. Then, the result of the Delphi Method indicated several recognize policies to mitigate those barriers. Moreover, related to the limitation of this study, future studies should focus on the barriers in diverse places nations or compare different regions or countries; include more experts from the various stakeholder group, and test the recognized policies in the real world.