Most failures develop as a result of a lack of resistivity information at the internal structure level during typical loading situations such as shock load and impact load. Impact loads have a significant impact on a component’s structural performance. A careful, organized examination of impact load settings and their side effects can reveal how well something can withstand peak loads. First, this study investigated the impact analyses on nine varied lightweight composite materials through a conventional experimental setup and computational tools. So, the best three lightweight materials are shortlisted for further investigation under complicated explicit analysis. Second, the study investigated the behavior of composite materials subjected to rapid loading circumstances in several real-time applications. The applications chosen include bullet crash analysis, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) propellers, and car bumpers. The three different principal composites, carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP), glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), and Kevlar fiber-reinforced polymer (KFRP), are selected and applied in crash analysis using ANSYS Workbench’s explicit technique-based finite element analysis (FEA). The comparison assessments are conducted using stumpy structural characteristics such as impact stress and equivalent strain. Two distinct grid convergence tests were performed to check whether the computational processes and discretization were correct. The standard methodologies were used on all three selected real-time applications, resulting in error percentages that were within acceptable bounds, ensuring the generation of dependable structural outputs. The ideal composite material is a Kevlar fiber-based composite with minimal defect affectability for all types of crash applications. Furthermore, multidisciplinary optimizations are performed, and the KFRP is verified to give good crash load resistance with reduced dense contribution.

Background and Aims: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been found effective in providing postoperative analgesia following a myriad of surgeries. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (USG) guided erector spinae plane block to provide postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods: This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomised parallel-group study conducted in patients undergoing PCNL. Patients in Group C (n = 33) received subcutaneous infiltration of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine at the incision site and Group B (n = 33) received USG guided ESPB with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine postoperatively. Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores were assessed at intervals of 30 min, 60 min, then hourly for six h, followed by four-hourly up to 24 h. The primary objective of the study was to compare postoperative pain relief using the NRS score between the two groups. Secondary objectives were to compare the analgesic requirement and to assess the incidence of complications. Normally distributed data were expressed as mean and standard deviation and analysed using Student's t-test. Data following non-normal distribution were expressed as median and interquartile range and analysed using Mann- Whitney U-test. For categorical data, the Chi-square test was used. Results: NRS scores were lower in Group B than Group C. There was significant prolongation in time for first analgesia in Group B (12 h) compared to Group C (30 min). There was a significant reduction in total tramadol consumption at 24 h postoperatively in the ESPB group. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided ESPB is an efficacious analgesic technique with an opioid-sparing effect following PCNL.

Background and Aims: Ultrasound-guided central venous (CV) cannulation is the standard of care for inserting CV catheter in the right internal jugular vein (RIJV). However, mechanical complications can still occur. The primary objective of this study was to compare the incidence of posterior vessel wall puncture (PVWP) using conventional needle holding technique with pen holding method of needle holding technique for IJV cannulation. Secondary objectives were comparison of other mechanical complications, access time and ease of the procedure. Methods: This prospective, randomised parallel-group study included 90 patients. Patients requiring ultrasound-guided RIJV cannulation under general anaesthesia were randomised into two groups P (n = 45) and C (n = 45). In group C, the RIJV was cannulated using the conventional needle holding technique. In group P, the pen holding method of needle holding technique was used. Incidence of PVWP, complications (arterial puncture, haematoma) number of attempts for successful cannulation, time to insertion of guidewire and performer’s ease were compared. The data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 24.0). A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In our study, there was no significant difference in incidence of PVWP and complications between the two groups. Number of attempts and time for successful guidewire insertion were comparable. Ease of the procedure was scored a median of 10 in both the groups. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the incidence of PVWP between the two techniques in this study, necessitating further evaluation of this novel technique.

Generally, the importance of bending test is used to analyse the resistivity effect on its larger face size.Comparatively, stress induction is quite large in the perpendicular face to the point of contact of bending load. Therefore the thickness wise maximum stress acting area of bending test specimen must be analysed for the purpose to estimate the breaking point of test specimen, which supported a lot in the life estimation of a component. In this work, three different composites were selected under primary composite materials and underwent bending testing for the purpose of material refinement to tackle compressive load based applications. Ansys Workbench 17.2 is an advancement tool, which is used in this work for composite generation and structural simulations. All the tests were effectively executed with the help of advanced coupling facility between different working environments. Finally, the numerical results were compared with experimental results and then suitable material is optimized. Also, the conventional theoretical formulae were used to validate the flexural outcomes. Further, the advanced finite element analyses simulations were expanded to advanced composites materials. From the above all studies, the superior material was finalized based on the multi-disciplinary optimization outcomes.