No abstract

The maximal anal basal pressure (MABP) was measured with probes of 0.3, 1, 2 and 3 cm diameter in 21 subjects, 60 years old, without anal pathology. The components of MABP were analyzed by inducing a maximal internal sphincter (IS) relaxation, taking pressure measurements in the conscious state and during narcosis with curarization. In seven cases pressure measurements were done on isolated anorectum after abdominoperineal rectum amputation. MABP increases with probe diameter before as well as during anaesthesia with curarization. The contribution of the striated sphincter tonic activity is constant within the range of probe diameters used. At rest, i.e. when the 0.3 cm diameter pressure recording probe is used, 30% of MABP is made up by striated sphincter tonic activity, 45% of it is due to nerve induced IS activity, 10% to purely myogenic IS activity and 15% can be attributed to the expansion of the haemorrhoidal plexuses. Although MABP is mainly based on active forces generated by the smooth and striated sphincter apparatus, the presence of the anal cushions is essential for perfect anal continence, as they have to fill the gap within the IS ring to hermetically close the anal canal. The global IS activity, contributing 50-60% of MABP at rest, can completely be inhibited by a maximal rectoanal inhibitory reflex. Stretching of passive elements starts at 1 cm anal distension, but steeply increases thereafter, accounting for 65% of the MABP at 3 cm anal distension. It is deduced that optimal stool diameter is about 2 cm.

Anismus, paradoxical external sphincter function, spastic pelvic floor syndrome, rectoanal dysnergia, abdomino-levator incoordination for abdominopelvic asychronism, are all due to paradoxical contraction of the striated sphincter apparatus during voiding and is characterised by prolonged and excessive straining at stool. Biofeedback is the treatment of choice and has to be introduced at an early stage. We present the results of an ambulatory approach based on the integration of simulated balloon defaecation with small (50 ml) as well as constant rectal sensation volume, defaecometry and anal manometry. The pathophysiology visualised by the patient's own anorectal pressure recordings on the screen of a personal computer is explained and corrected. Sixteen patients were treated and followed for at least 1 year. Manometric data were normal except for an increased minimum residual pressure and rectal compliance. Nine patients could not evacuate a 50 ml bolus initially. Simulated defaecation became possible in seven out of these nine patients when the bolus was increased up to the individual constant rectal sensation volume. Two patients could not evacuate this volume either, while defaecation was made much less laborious in the other seven patients. Paradoxical contraction was immediately corrected in 7/16 cases. Also, as an immediate, objective benefit of a single training session, improved defaecation of a 50 ml bolus was observed in 11 patients. This effect was preserved after 6 weeks in nine cases; symptomatic recurrence did not occur in these patients during follow-up. This method of defaecation training has many advantages as compared with sphincter training using EMG electrodes eventually performed in the absence of a desire to defaecate or in lying position.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In order to evaluate whether rectal volume, weight or pressure is the main trigger for rectal sensation, their respective values were determined at each of the rectal filling sensation thresholds (first, constant, urge, maximum) in 12 adult control subjects. The rectal balloon was filled at 60 ml/min in sitting position using water (twice), air and mercury consecutively. Pressure values were corrected for the elastic properties of the balloon, while the volume of inflated air was recalculated taking into account the prevalent rectal pressure and temperature. The results obtained using water, air and mercury demonstrated a constant relationship between a given rectal sensation level and the pressure recorded in the distending balloon, but not its volume or weight. Pressure values recorded at each sensation level were constant during repeated determinations of rectal sensation, the volume of rectal distension increased, probably because the rectum had already been dilated by previous testing. Balloon distension using air with the patient in the lateral position were found to be most practical for routine evaluation of rectal sensation. It is therefore concluded that any disturbance of rectal sensation will be reflected by changes in pressure and not by changes in the volume needed to produce a given sensation level. The location of the receptors involved has to be elucidated, but it seems that the pelvic floor can be excluded since the weight of the rectal contents was not related to sensation.

We determined the maximum closing capability of the internal anal sphincter muscle ring in vitro and in vivo. The internal sphincter, 4 to 6 mm thick, cannot close the anal canal hermetically, not even during maximal contraction. The blood-filled anal cushions have to fill up an intrasphincteric gap of at least 7 to 8 mm in diameter.