Tunnel field effect transistor (TFET) is being considered as an alternative to the conventional MOSFETs for low power system on chip applications. In this Letter, gate-drain underlap (UL) feature of double gate TFET for analogue/RF characteristic is discussed. Here, it is found that parasitic resistance induced by gate drain UL is not significant as compared with DG tunnel field effect transistor (DG-FET). Thus, the behaviour of RF figure of merit is different from DG-FET.
The tunnel field effect transistor (TFET) and its analog/RF performance is being aggressively studied at device architecture level for low power SoC design. Therefore, in this paper we have investigated the influence of the gate-drain underlap (UL) and different dielectric materials for the spacer and gate oxide on DG-TFET (double gate TFET) and its analog/RF performance for low power applications. Here, it is found that the drive current behavior in DG-TFET with a UL feature while implementing dielectric material for the spacer is different in comparison to that of DG-FET. Further, hetero gate dielectric-based DG-TFET (HGDG-TFET) is more resistive against drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL) as compared to DG-TFET with high-k (HK) gate dielectric. Along with that, as compared to DG-FET, this paper also analyses the attributes of UL and dielectric material on analog/RF performance of DG-TFET in terms of transconductance (g m ), transconductance generation factor (TGF), capacitance, intrinsic resistance (Rdcr), cut-off frequency (F T ), and maximum oscillation frequency (F max ). The LK spacer-based HGDG-TFET with a gate-drain UL has the potential to improve the RF performance of device.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.