Abstract:Altered olfactory function is a common symptom of COVID-19, but its etiology is unknown. A key question is whether SARS-CoV-2 (CoV-2) – the causal agent in COVID-19 – affects olfaction directly, by infecting olfactory sensory neurons or their targets in the olfactory bulb, or indirectly, through perturbation of supporting cells. Here we identify cell types in the olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulb that express SARS-CoV-2 cell entry molecules. Bulk sequencing demonstrated that mouse, non-human primate and human olfactory mucosa expresses two key genes involved in CoV-2 entry, ACE2 and TMPRSS2. However, single cell sequencing revealed that ACE2 is expressed in support cells, stem cells, and perivascular cells, rather than in neurons. Immunostaining confirmed these results and revealed pervasive expression of ACE2 protein in dorsally-located olfactory epithelial sustentacular cells and olfactory bulb pericytes in the mouse. These findings suggest that CoV-2 infection of non-neuronal cell types leads to anosmia and related disturbances in odor perception in COVID-19 patients.
Recent reports suggest an association between COVID-19 and altered olfactory function. Here we analyze bulk and single cell RNA-Seq datasets to identify cell types in the olfactory epithelium that express molecules that mediate infection by SARS-CoV-2 (CoV-2), the causal agent in COVID-19. We find in both mouse and human datasets that olfactory sensory neurons do not express two key genes involved in CoV-2 entry, ACE2 and TMPRSS2. In contrast, olfactory epithelial support cells and stem cells express both of these genes, as do cells in the nasal respiratory epithelium. Taken together, these findings suggest possible mechanisms through which CoV-2 infection could lead to anosmia or other forms of olfactory dysfunction.
A growing number of single-cell sequencing platforms enable joint profiling of multiple omics from the same cells. We present , a novel method that not only allows for analyzing the data from joint-modality platforms, but provides a coherent framework for the integration of multiple datasets measured on different modalities. We demonstrate its performance on multi-modality data of gene expression and chromatin accessibility and illustrate the integration abilities of by jointly analyzing this multi-modality data with single-cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq datasets.
Understanding
the complex interplay of factors affecting nanoparticle
accumulation in solid tumors is a challenge that must be surmounted
to develop effective cancer nanomedicine. Among other unique microenvironment
properties, tumor vascular permeability is an important feature of
leaky tumor vessels which enables nanoparticles to extravasate. However,
permeability has thus far been measured by intravital microscopy on
optical window tumors, which has many limitations of its own. Additionally,
mathematical models of particle tumor transport are often too complicated
to be accessible to most researchers. Here, we present a more simplified
and accessible mathematical model based on diffusive flux, which uses
particle tumor accumulation and plasma pharmacokinetics to yield effective
permeability, P
eff. This model, called
diffusive flux modeling (DFM), allows effects from multiple parameters
to be decoupled and is also the first demonstration, to the best our
knowledge, of extracting P
eff values from
bulk biodistribution results (e.g., routine positron emission tomography
studies). The DFM equation was used to explain in vivo results of sub-20 nm nanocarriers called three-helix-micelles (3HM),
particularly 3HM’s selective accumulation in different tumor
models. When DFM was applied to multiple published biodistribution
data, a semiquantitative comparison of various tumor models, particle
size, and active targeting strategies could be made. The analysis
clearly pointed out the importance of balancing multiple characteristics
of nanoparticles to ensure successful treatment outcome and highlights
the usefulness of this simple model for initial particle design, selection,
and subsequent optimization.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.