Disruptive social events like the Covid-19 pandemic can have significant impact on the commercial sex industry, yet these effects have been little understood. This paper examines the effect of the pandemic on one part of the commercial sex industry: sex trafficking. Our results from scraped sexual service advertisements show that the pandemic has had measurable impact on online advertising for sex trafficking in the United States, with a significant decrease associated with stay-at-home orders followed by an increase to levels well above prepandemic levels as Covid-related restrictions were relaxed. We contribute to the policy landscape by showing that the initial decrease was associated with a loss of demand for sexual services due to pandemic-related health concerns, but that a confluence of factors, including the lack of economic and social support, increased the number of people vulnerable to being exploited. This study can assist policy makers in predicting future changes in the sex industry to support a more just and inclusive society. In the context of future health crises, natural disasters, and major social disruptions it can guide policy makers in apportioning public aid in a way that does not leave vulnerable populations and existing sex workers powerless to being trafficked.

This article highlights the concerns facing foreign national children who are both victims of human trafficking and under the jurisdiction of juvenile and family courts. Human trafficking is modern day slavery in which individuals, including children, are compelled into service and exploited. Foreign national human trafficking victims in juvenile and family court systems must navigate both the state system and a complex federal immigration system. This article explains the federal benefits available to these children and identifies the best practice approaches for juvenile and family court systems to increase identification of and support for foreign national child trafficking victims.

No abstract

No abstract

New York State initiated a micro-cluster strategy ("hot spotting") that divides into three categories based on COVID-19 cases and hospital capacity, each with successively more restrictions: Yellow, Orange, and Red Zones. Our objectives were to evaluate the influence of hot spotting on mobility and subsequent mortality, and then to identify underlying social determinants of health associated with the neighborhoods most affected by hot spotting.Study Design: We combine several data sources in our analysis. Time-dependent data were obtained from SafeGraph for cellphone mobility at the Census Block Group, New York State Governor's Office for hot spotting, school and indoor dining, and NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) for COVID-19 cases and mortality. Using the DOHMH's "Modified Zip Code Tabulation Areas" (MODZCTA), we matched these to community-level data obtained from 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates for population density. Our main outcomes are Average Median Percentage Time Home (AMPTH) and Device-Weighted Average Median Percentage Time Home (DWAMPTH) from SafeGraph Social Distancing Metrics summarized to MODZCTA boundaries. Home is defined as the common nighttime location of each mobile device over a 6-week period to a Geohash-7 granularity (w153m x w153m). We implemented the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with a <0.05 p-value threshold for each day since hot spotting policy to compare MODZCTA with any of the Zone's designation to those without designation. Our main outcomes are Average Median Percentage Time Home (AMPTH) and Device-Weighted Average Median Percentage Time Home (DWAMPTH) from SafeGraph Social Distancing Metrics summarized to MODZCTA boundaries.Population Studied: NYC residents from October 5, 2020, to December 31, 2020 (87 days total) using the 177 MODZCTA within NYC as geographic unit of analysis.Results: For the AMPTH measurement, MODZCTAs with hot spotting Zone's designation had 84 days (95% of the days) with statistically significantly lower mobility than non-intervention MODZCTAs, and for the DWAMPTH measurement, 83 days (97% of the days) had statistically significantly lower mobility. 58 of the days had p-value<0.001 for AMPTH and 49 had p-value<0.001 for DWAMPTH, and only a minority of days had p-value>0.1 (2 days for AMPTH and 3 for DWAMPTH). Looking at individual boroughs, Brooklyn had 42 statistically significant days for AMPTH and 49 for DWAMPTH, while Queens had 12 statistically significant days for AMPTH and 7 for DWAMPTH.Conclusions: New York State's micro-cluster focus Zones is associated with decreased mobility in high COVID-19 prevalence areas. Our study suggests that shutdowns targeted at small geographic areas may reduce mobility and thus can potentially help control COVID-19 spread.