Objectives: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. A disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type-1 repeats-13 (ADAMTS-13) is a metalloprotease that cleaves plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers. The presence of large VWF multimers in the plasma due to ADAMTS-13 deficiency is the main factor in the pathogenesis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. The present study aimed to investigate the relation of plasma levels of ADAMTS-13 and VWF antigen with VTE. Methods: The present study included 30 patients with VTE and age-and gender-matched 30 healthy subjects. Patients with any condition (diabetes, icterus, hyperlipidemia, physical, or surgical trauma, acute coronary syndrome, pregnancy, renal insufficiency, liver disease, malignancy, collagen tissue disease, chronic or acute inflammation, drug use affecting thrombocyte function) that could affect plasma VWF antigen or ADAMTS-13 levels were excluded. Plasma ADAMTS-13 and VWF antigen levels in the VTE and control groups were quantitatively determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Results: The median ADAMTS-13 level was 280 ng/ml (minimum-maximum, 70-1120 ng/ml) in the VTE group and 665 ng/ml (minimum-maximum, 350-2500 ng/ml) in the control group; the difference between the groups was significant (P < 0.0001). The mean VWF antigen level was 1750 ± 616 mU/ml in the patient group, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (950 ± 496 mU/ml) (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Significantly lower ADAMTS-13 levels and significantly higher VWF antigen levels were concluded to be the result of a pathological process rather than an etiological factor for VTE.

COVID-19 is a disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The introduction of vaccines against COVID-19 caused great enthusiasm around the world as immunization might end the pandemic. However, it was previously stated that COVID-19 cases would rarely continue to occur despite immunization. Fourteen days after the second dose of the vaccine, a 66-year-old male patient with a negative COVID-19 PCR test result and high levels of IgG and low levels of IgM-A against SARS-CoV-2 was admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) due to the clinical picture of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to stress the need for continuing preventive measures in vaccinated individuals, too, by presenting the clinical findings of the patient, who was considered to have developed ARDS due to COVID-19, as high levels of IgG and IgM-A against SARS-CoV-2 were detected on day 8 during ICU admission.

Objective: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic disease characterized by widespread pain. Somatic complaints associated with the cardiovascular system, such as chest pain and palpitations, are frequently seen in FM patients. P and QT dispersions are simple and inexpensive measurements reflecting the regional heterogeneity of atrial and ventricular repolarization, respectively. QT dispersion can cause serious ventricular arrhythmias. The aim of the present study was to evaluate QT dispersion and P wave dispersion in patients with FM.Material and Methods: The study involved 48 FM patients who fulfilled the established criteria and 32 healthy controls (HC). A standard 12-lead electrocardiogram was performed on all participants. QT dispersion was defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest QT intervals. Similarly, the differences between the shortest and longest P waves were defined as P wave dispersion. Results:The QT dispersion and corrected QT dispersion were shorter in the FM group compared with the HC group (p<0.001 for both). In terms of the P wave dispersion value, there was no significant difference between the FM and HC groups (p=0.088).Conclusion: Longer QT and P wave dispersions are not problems in patients with FM. Therefore, it may be concluded that fibromyalgia does not include an increased risk of atrial and/or ventricular arrhythmias.

Introduction: A vast majority of multiple myeloma (MM) patients requires subsequent lines of therapy following relapses. The choice of regimen following relapse is influenced by response, tolerance to prior therapies, as well as by disease and patient features. Treatment options are limited for those who develop triple-class refractory disease. In this setting, the role of a salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (sAHCT) is controversial. This unmet need has driven the development of new therapies with novel mechanisms of action. Selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound, was recently approved by the FDA and EMA for use in heavily pretreated relapse refractory (RRMM) patients, including triple-class refractory RRMM and FDA has also approved the agent in patients with first relapse. In the absence of head-to-head studies, comparison of treatment options among triple-class treated patients is based on real world experience. Here we performed a retrospective comparison between outcomes following sAHCT versus Selinexor combinations administered among RRMMs. Patients & Methods: Between January 2015 and April 2021, 22 patients at our center underwent sAHCT for treatment of refractory relapse. A transplant was defined as salvage if the patient had already received one prior AHCT and underwent a further AHCT after evidence of disease progression not responding to second generation proteasome inhibitors (PI), İmmunomodulating agents (IMID) or antiCD38 monoclonal antibody. We compared the outcomes of these patients with 10 RRMM patients who had exhausted their treatment options and were progressing on their last line of therapy to receive Selinexor, dexamethasone in combination with either bortezomib (n=7) (XVd) or carfilzomib (n=3) (XCd) as a part of a Karyopharm Expanded Access Program (KEAP). Selinexor was administered 80-100 mg po weekly in combination. Response and disease progression were assessed according to the IMWG criteria. Results: Patients' characteristics and the outcome of treatments are shown in Table. The median age of patients was similar in both groups. Patients were heavily treated with a median of 6 prior lines of therapy (4-9) and 2 out of 10 carried high-risk cytogenetics in SVd group. Seven (31.8%) patients with high-risk cytogenetics underwent sAHCT. All patients were treated with or refractory to immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitors. Five patients responded to DCEP bridging therapy prior to sAHCT. Five patients received Selinexor after sAHCT. One patient underwent sAHCT due to progression under Selinexor treatment. In sAHCT group, 68.2% of patients relapsed within a median of 6.3 months (Figure-1). Figure-2 shows the impact of the prior lines of therapy and selinoxor on PFS.Adverse events on selinexor regimens included fatigue, nausea, thrombocytopenia which were managed with Selinexor dose adjustment and supportive care. Two patients eventually transitioned to new therapies, while 4 still remain on SVd due to continued response. Conclusion: Our results based on a small number of patients, compared with outcomes post sAHCT reflects comparable duration of response and disease control rates with Selinexor-PI regimens among selected patients. Hospitalization and prolonged infusions are not required with the selinexor regimens, and prolonged treatment is possible with advance in lines of therapy duration of response lessens with any treatment modality. Despite of a DCEP bridging therapy prior to sAHCT, Selinexor combos have achieved similar PFS even among triple class refractory MM patients. For countries where CAR-T therapies are not accessible, sAHCT and Selinexor combinations may be considered as a valid clinical option after failing CD38 monoclonal antibodies, PI and IMIDs. These data support the use of selinexor-based regimens in the treatment of relapsed MM, and given the potency of the combinations, in earlier lines of therapy including in patients who have received anti-CD38 mAbs. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kashyap: Karyopharm: Current Employment. Niblock: Karyopharm: Current Employment. Beksac: Amgen,Celgene,Janssen,Takeda,Oncopeptides,Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Selinexor has not been approved for myeloma patients in Turkey. It could be used as a part of Karyopharm Expanded Access program (KEAP).

No abstract