M. Duchêne et al. Conclusion. -Tous les types d'implantation peuvent être responsables d'un syndrome UGH. Un implant dans le sac ne doit pas faire éliminer le diagnostic. Le syndrome UGH reste d'actualité et doit être reconnu pour adapter la prise en charge thérapeutique.
Precis:
Ophthalmic artery (OA) and superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) blood flow were quantified by phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC MRI) and seemed lower in glaucoma. Venous flow dynamics was different in glaucoma patients with a significantly decreased pulsatility.
Introduction:
Studies using color Doppler imaging and optical coherence tomography flowmetry strongly suggested that vascular changes are involved in the pathophysiology of glaucoma, but the venous outflow has been little studied beyond the episcleral veins. This study measured the OA and the SOV flow by PC MRI in glaucoma patients compared with controls.
Methods:
Eleven primary open-angle glaucoma patients, with a mean±SD visual field deficit of −2.3±2.7 dB and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness of 92±13 µ, and 10 controls of similar age, were examined by PC MRI. The mean, maximal and minimal flow over cardiac cycle were measured. The variation of flow (ΔQ) was calculated.
Results:
The OA mean±SD mean flow was 13.21±6.79 in patients and 15.09±7.62 mL/min in controls (P=0.35) and the OA maximal flow was 25.70±12.08 mL/min in patients, and 28.45±10.64 mL/min in controls (P=0.22). In the SOV the mean±SD mean flow was 6.46±5.50 mL/min in patients and 7.21±6.04 mL/min in controls (P=0.81) and the maximal flow was 9.06±6.67 in patients versus 11.96±9.29 mL/min in controls (P=0.47). The ΔQ in the SOV was significantly lower in patients (5.45±2.54 mL/min) than in controls (9.09±5.74 mL/min) (P=0.04).
Discussion:
Although no significant difference was found, the mean and maximal flow in the OA and SOV seemed lower in glaucoma patients than in controls. The SOV flow waveform might be affected in glaucoma, corroborating the hypothesis of an impairment of venous outflow in those patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.