Purpose: To present an update on indications and efficacy of oral mucosal grafts in the clinical management of ocular surface diseases focusing on the new developments of the last 5 years. Methods: Pubmed research on the databases of the years 2007 up to 2012 for the key words mucous membrane graft and eye, fornix reconstruction, eyelid reconstruction, and conjunctival replacement. Results: Well-documented clinical indications for oral mucosal grafting to the ocular surface include correction of restricted socket syndrome, ocular adnexal reconstruction after tumor resection, cicatricial ocular surface diseases and therapy-refractory pterygia. New indications are conjunctival insufficiency after filtrating glaucoma surgery and the combination of mucosa and amniotic membrane grafting for fornix reconstruction. Moreover, different strategies for ex vivo mucous epithelial cell expansion are under discussion. Conclusions: Oral mucosal grafting is a viable option for the replacement of the conjunctiva. Advantages include easily accessibility of grafts in sufficient size even for repeated procedures and a high stability of the grafts. On the other hand, nasal mucosal grafts are superior for some indications due to the lack of goblet cells in the oral mucosa.

Toxic maculopathy due to the consumption of poppers is an important differential diagnosis in acute visual loss without clinico-morphological correlate. Optical coherence tomography is the only reliable diagnostic tool in these cases. Complete recovery of visual function and macular morphology is rare, even after cessation of drug abuse. Oral lutein therapy may have a beneficial effect.

We present four cases of esophageal rupture (three iatrogenic, one Boerhaave syndrome) to demonstrate the difficulty in diagnosis and therapy. The current literature is discussed and conclusions are drawn as regards the modus operandi. All our patients were operated on. The site of esophageal rupture was always closed with a primary suture and substantial irrigation and drainage were performed. In two cases the suture line was in addition covered with fibrin glue or by an omentum flap, respectively. All patients survived and recovered was unremarkable. Our own results and a subsequent analysis of literature allow the following conclusions. At an early stage of esophageal rupture surgical intervention is indicated. The method of choice is primary closure of the rupture site by suture, possibly combined with a muscle or omentum flap. In cases of delayed diagnosis with advanced mediastinitis, suture of the rupture site should also be striven for. Additional coverage is advisable in these cases. Resection procedures with or without reconstruction should be done only in exceptional cases before of the high surgical risk.

No abstract